Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Changes in the Relationship between the Outcomes of Cohabiting Partnerships and Fertility among Young British Women: Evidence from the 1958 and 1970 Birth Cohort Studies

By Fiona Steele, Heather Joshi, Constantinos Kallis and Harvey Goldstein

Abstract

We investigate the effects of a range of time-varying fertility indicators, including pregnancy, and the presence and characteristics of children, on the outcomes of nonmarital unions for two cohorts of British women. We compare the effect of conceptions and births on the odds that a cohabiting partnership is dissolved or that it is converted to marriage for women born in 1958 and 1970. The analysis uses a multilevel competing risks model to allow for multiple partnerships and conceptions, and to distinguish between two outcomes of cohabiting unions (separation and marriage). We also use a multiprocess model, in which the outcomes of cohabitation are modelled simultaneously with fertility, to allow for the potential joint determination of partnership and childbearing decisions. The analysis is based on partnership and birth histories between the ages of 16 and 29, and social background, in the National Child Development Study and the 1970 British Birth Cohort Study

Publisher: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University of London
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:5936

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A General Multistate Competing Risks Model for Event History Data, with an Application to the Study of Contraceptive Use Dynamics.” doi
  2. (2005). A User’s Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.0. Centre for Multilevel Modelling,
  3. (1999). Becoming a Single Mother.” In:
  4. (2003). Change and Continuity in Family Formation Among Young Adults
  5. Changing Britain: Families and Households in the 1990s. doi
  6. (2000). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Not for Long, but Here to doi
  7. (2001). Demographic Aspects of Cohabitation in doi
  8. (2006). Employment, Family Union, and Childbearing Decisions in doi
  9. (2001). Entry into Parenthood and the Outcome of Cohabiting Partnerships in doi
  10. (1999). Family Change: Revolution or Backlash in Attitudes?” In: S. McRae (Ed), Changing Britain: Families and Households in the 1990s.
  11. (2003). From School to the Labour Market.” In:
  12. (1999). Introduction: Family and Household Change in Britain.” In: S. McRae (Ed), Changing Britain: Families and Households in the 1990s. doi
  13. (2005). MCMC Estimation in MLwiN.
  14. (2006). Modelling Non-response in the National Child Development doi
  15. (1995). NCDS5 Child Histories: Reconciling Self-Completion and Interview Data.
  16. (1995). NCDS5 Partnership Histories. Data Note 2.
  17. (2002). Nonmarital Childbearing: doi
  18. (2004). Office for National Statistics. doi
  19. (2004). Partnerships and
  20. (2003). Partnerships and Parenthood.” In:
  21. (2000). Patterns of Household and Family Formation.” In: doi
  22. (1995). Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Dissolution: doi
  23. (1996). The Determinants of the Duration of Contraceptive Use in China: A Multilevel Multinomial Discrete Hazards Modelling Approach.” doi
  24. (2000). The Evolution of Cohabitation in
  25. (1997). The National Child Development Study: An Introduction to the Origins of the Study and the Methods of Data Collection. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education,
  26. (2005). The Puzzling Rise of Childbearing Outside Marriage.” In: doi
  27. (2001). The Rise of Cohabitation and Childbearing Outside Marriage in doi
  28. (2001). Transitions from School to Work in a Changing Social Context.” Young: doi
  29. (1997). Twenty-Something in the 1990s: Getting On, Getting By, Getting Nowhere.
  30. (1999). Why Do Cohabiting Couples Marry? An Example of a Causal Event Hi story Approach to Interdependent Systems.”
  31. (1999). Why Do Cohabiting Couples Marry? An Example of a Causal Event History Approach to Interdependent Systems.”
  32. (1995). Why Marry? Race and the Transition to Marriage Among Cohabitors.”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.