Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The text as a critical object: On theorising exegetic procedure in classroom-based critical discourse analysis

By John O'Regan

Abstract

One of the reasons CDA calls itself critical is because its perspectives of discourse and society are largely derived from critical social theory. Transferring these perspectives to educational contexts requires that teachers develop workable pedagogic frameworks and procedures which apply CDA principles and practices to the reading and discussion of texts in the classroom. If these are to be considered ‘critical,’ it seems useful that these are also derived from critical social theory. This type of critical theorisation seems to be underdeveloped in a CDA which relies principally on systemic functional linguistics for its procedural attitude to the text. This paper suggests a possible development of this space in which exegetic procedure and discussion are theorised from critical perspectives in the thought of Adorno, Derrida and Habermas, and according to systemic perspectives in the work of Foucault. The paper also presents a framework of analysis for use by teachers and students which is based on these perspectives

Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:5836

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). [1972]). The Archaeology of Knowledge.
  2. (1994). Adorno and Authoritarian Rationalism. Foreword to T. Adorno, The Stars Down to Earth
  3. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.).
  4. (2005). Being ‘Critical’ as Taking a Stand: One of the Central Dilemmas of CDA: How Do We Get Beyond It? Critical Discourse Studies, doi
  5. (1993). Beyond Superstructuralism.
  6. (1976). Cohesion in English.
  7. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society.
  8. (2001). Critical Applied Linguistics. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi
  9. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.
  10. (1992). Critical Language Awareness and Emancipatory Discourse. In
  11. (1996). Critical Linguistics. In
  12. (1992). Critical Literacy Awareness in the EFL Classroom. In
  13. (2003). Critical Reading in Language Education.
  14. (1999). D&S Forum: discourse analysis and the need for being critical all the way through. doi
  15. (1992). Deconstruction, Postmodernism and Philosophy: Habermas on Derrida. In
  16. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge:
  17. (1981). Dissemination. London: The Athlone Press Derrida,
  18. (1999). Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas and Contemporary French Thought.
  19. (1998). Front Pages: (the Critical) Analysis of Newspaper Layout. In
  20. (1992). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In
  21. (1997). Genres and Registers of Discourse. In
  22. (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere.
  23. (1994). Incommensurable Discourses? doi
  24. (1990). Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas (2nd ed.). Cambridge:
  25. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  26. (1989). Language and Power.
  27. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power.
  28. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning.
  29. (1989). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford:
  30. (1976). Legitimation Crisis.
  31. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In
  32. (1982). Marxism and Deconstruction: A Critical Articulation. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins doi
  33. (1992). Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, The Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas.
  34. (1989). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.
  35. (1973). Negative Dialectics.
  36. (2005). Normativity and the Material Effects of Discourse.
  37. (1976). Of Grammatology.
  38. (2004). On Being Critical.
  39. (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida.
  40. (1995). Points: Interviews, 1974-1994. Stanford CA:
  41. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations.
  42. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings.
  43. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design.
  44. (1998). Regulation in ‘progressivist’ pedagogic discourse: individualised teacher-pupil talk.
  45. (1996). Representational Resources and the Production of Subjectivity: Questions for the Theoretical Development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a Multicultural Society. In
  46. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.
  47. (2001). Teaching Readings? In B. Comber & A. Simpson (Eds.), Negotiating Critical Literacies in Classrooms. New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates.
  48. (1996). Technologisation of Discourse. In
  49. (1957). Television and the Patterns of Mass Culture. In
  50. (2000). The Adorno Reader. B. O’Connor (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. 1 I am grateful to Allan Luke for comments he made on an earlier draft of this paper.
  51. (1977). The Concept of Totality in Lukacs and Adorno.
  52. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity.
  53. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity.
  54. (1998). The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern.
  55. (1968). The Genealogy of Morals.
  56. (1996). The Habermas Reader.
  57. (1996). The Habermas Reader. W. Outhwaite (Ed.). Cambridge:
  58. (1981). The Order of Discourse. In
  59. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity.
  60. (1997). The Postmodern Turn.
  61. (1989). The Public Sphere. In
  62. (1994). The Stars Down to Earth.
  63. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.
  64. (1982). The Subject
  65. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action,
  66. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Lifeworld and System:
  67. (1968). The Will to Power.
  68. (1974). Theory and Practice.
  69. (1997). What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it? Language and Literature, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.