Article thumbnail

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

By James Thomas and Angela Harden
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). (Eds): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
  2. (2007). A: Accidental Injury, Risk-Taking Behaviour and the Social Circumstances in which Young People Live: A systematic review
  3. (2004). A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health.
  4. (2001). A: Children talking about healthy eating: data from focus groups with 300 9–11-yearolds. Nutr Bull doi
  5. (2005). A: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.
  6. (2001). A: Young People and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
  7. (2001). A: Young People and Mental Health: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
  8. (2001). A: Young People and Physical Activity: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
  9. (2006). A: Young People, Pregnancy and Social Exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support
  10. (2006). AJ: Conducting a critical interpretative synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups.
  11. (2001). Altman D: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context London:
  12. (2006). AP: Helping practitioners understand the contribution of qualitative research to evidence-based practice. Evid Based Nurs
  13. (2001). Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ
  14. (1996). C: Qualitative research in healthcare II: a structured review and evaluation of studies.
  15. (2003). Children and Healthy Eating: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
  16. (2003). Collins LJ: The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies.
  17. (1997). Ed: Qualitative Research: Theory, method and practice London: Sage;
  18. (2006). EPPI-Centre: EPPI-Centre Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews
  19. (2006). EPPI-Reviewer 3.0: Analysis and management of data for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre software London: EPPI-Centre,
  20. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med
  21. (2000). Experiments in Knowing: Gender and methods in the social sciences Cambridge:
  22. (2002). Finding the findings in qualitative studies. doi
  23. (1996). Group: Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Med Sociol News
  24. (2002). H: A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof
  25. (2007). Handbook for Synthesising Qualitative Research
  26. (1988). Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies Newbury Park: Sage;
  27. (1994). Hedges L: The Handbook of Research Synthesis
  28. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res
  29. (2007). Hughes E: Hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. doi
  30. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: an example from public health. BMJ
  31. L: Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence London: Cabinet Office;
  32. (1995). Listening to Children London: Barnardo's;
  33. (2001). Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research Thousand Oaks,
  34. (2005). Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews.
  35. (2006). Moving Beyond Effectiveness in Evidence Synthesis London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence;
  36. (2005). Moving beyond floccinaucinihilipilification: enhancing the utility of systematic reviews. doi
  37. (2001). Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: a systematic review of different study designs. Health Educ J
  38. (2004). Qualitative meta-synthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res
  39. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess
  40. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qual Inq
  41. Quantity and Quality in Social Research London:
  42. (2004). RB: Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in Medline. Medinfo
  43. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ
  44. (2006). Roberts H: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide Oxford:
  45. (1994). Scientific communication and literature retrieval.
  46. (2002). Social science and evidence-based everything: the case of education. Educ Rev
  47. (2003). Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities. Qual Res
  48. (1994). Systematic reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ
  49. (2006). Team: Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE. Qual Health Res
  50. (1987). Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals.
  51. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information Sage: doi
  52. (2003). Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: the role of rigorous, transparent and up-to-date evaluations. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci
  53. Types of synthesis and their criteria. In Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation Edited by:
  54. (2002). Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy
  55. (2006). Using Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews: Older people's views of hospital discharge London: Social Care Institute for Excellence;
  56. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qual Health Res doi
  57. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol
  58. (1999). What is evidence-based education?
  59. What's Wrong with Ethnography?