Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The institutions of open source software: examining the Debian community

By Juan Mateos-Garcia and W. Edward Steinmueller

Abstract

Free and open source software activities involve and, perhaps, evolve institutions (rules, norms and standards) that influence the formation, growth, and demise of communities. Community institutions are attractors for some individuals while discouraging other individuals from entering or continuing to participate. Their suitability may change as a community grows. This paper examines the institutions of the Debian community where issues of community identity, distribution of authority, and decentralisation have facilitated growth and development. These same institutions have also resulted in conflicts regarding community purposes and the quality and delivery of the community’s output. We examine the institutional redesign undertaken to address these problems and derive implications for F/LOS communities and companies

Topics: N215 Change and Innovation
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.06.001
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.brighton.ac.uk:5341

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). 57 All electronically available documents last retrieved on the 28th
  2. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. doi
  3. (1998). Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the Internet. doi
  4. (1964). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. doi
  5. (2001). Epistemic communities, situated learning and open source software development. Working paper: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/kasperedwardsec.pdf#search=%22kasper%20edwards%20epistemic%22
  6. (2002). Evolution Patterns of Open Source Systems and Communities. doi
  7. (2003). From Toy Story to Toy History: a deep analysis of Debian GNU/Linux.
  8. (2002). innovation networks - by and for users.
  9. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination.
  10. (2004). Linux adoption in the public sector: An economic analysis.
  11. (2003). Managing the boundary of an ‘open’ project. Santa Fe Institute (SFI) Workshop on The Network Construction of Markets.
  12. (1999). Open source software development as a special type of academic research (Critique of vulgar Raymondism). doi
  13. (2003). Organising for creativity: Community, economy and space,
  14. (2001). Putting it all in the trunk: incremental software development in the FreeBSD open source project. doi
  15. (2002). Rebel Code: Linux and the Open Source Revolution.
  16. (2002). The Boston Consulting Group Hacker Survey Release
  17. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly and Associates,
  18. (2005). The Debian New Maintainer Process: History and Aims.
  19. (2001). The Hacker Ethic.
  20. (2002). The open source way of working: A new paradigm for the division of labour in software development?.
  21. (2000). The simple economics of open source. doi
  22. (2004). The Success of Open Source.
  23. (2005). Three Ethical Moments in Debian. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.