Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Three educational scenarios for the future : lessons from the sociology of knowledge

By Michael Young and Johan Muller

Abstract

This review draws on social realist approaches in the sociology of knowledge and in light of them constructs three scenarios for the future of education in the next decades. The primary focus of the review is on one of the most crucial questions facing educational policy makers- the relationship between school and everyday or common sense knowledge. The different possibilities for how the school/nonschool knowledge boundaries might be approached are expressed in three scenarios - 'boundaries as given', 'a boundary-less world’ and the idea of ‘boundary maintenance as a condition for boundary crossing’. The educational implications of each are explored and the review makes the case for the third scenario. The factors likely to make one or other scenario dominate educational policy in the next 20-30 years are also considered

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:4279

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). Alasdair MacIntyre on Education: In Dialogue with Joseph Dunne,
  2. Bachelard: Science and Objectivity, doi
  3. (2008). Curriculum reform in French-speaking Belgium. Paper presented to ECER
  4. (2006). Entwhistle.H(1979) Antonio Gramsci: Conservative schooling for radical politics, London Routledge (Education)
  5. (2004). Framing talk: towards a ‘radical visible pedagogy’,
  6. (1994). Gellner.E(1996) The Social Philosophy Of Ernest Gellner.(Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 48) (Edited by
  7. (2007). How competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: a modified Bernsteinian analysis, doi
  8. (2007). Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy. doi
  9. (1995). Marketing postmodernism, in R. Orrill (ed) The Condition of American Liberal Education: Pragmatism and a Changing Tradition. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  10. Negri.A(2000) Empire, doi
  11. (2006). On Truth and Meaning.
  12. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. doi
  13. (2000). P(2008) Time for bold experiments, http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/oct/07/schools.teaching
  14. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. doi
  15. (2005). Perks.D(2007) What is science education for? Institute for Ideas, London Reeves,
  16. (2007). Re-thinking Expertise.
  17. (2001). Re-thinking Science.
  18. Santos.B(2001) Towards an epistemology of blindness,
  19. Sharples.M et al (2007) (2007) A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age.
  20. (1984). The art of fiction, no. 84, The Paris Review, Fall. Quoted by Charles Simic,
  21. (1998). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order,
  22. (2007). The reproduction of social class inequalities through mathematics pedagogies in South African primary schools.
  23. (2000). The Sociology of Philosophies. doi
  24. (2004). The what and how of teaching and learning,
  25. (2006). Theory and practice in the vocational curriculum, in M. Young & J. Gamble (eds) Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Further Education.
  26. (2007). Truth and truthfulness in sociology of educational knowledge. Theory and Research in Education, 4, 2: Young.M(2007) Bringing knowledge Back In: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education, London doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.