Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Mothers, gender and inclusion in the context of home-school relations

By Barbara Cole


The last twenty years have seen the proliferation of policies calling for the development of home-school relations and home-school partnerships for it is argued that it is important for the educational success of all children that parents and professionals share aims, values and responsibilities. The dominant discourse around home-school relations refers to ‘parents’ as partners, maintaining that their voices are important and should be heard along with those of professionals. This is also held to be the case where children are categorised as ‘having special educational needs’ and a number of policies require that ‘parents’ are consulted wherever possible. However, this paper maintains that despite this rhetoric there is a boundary between home and school; between the professional, public space of school and the private, personal space of home, which reflects the power relations between public professionals and private parents. It maintains that the use of the gender neutral term ‘parent’ masks the gendered reality of ‘parenting’, making it easier for professionals to marginalise the individual voices of personal experience. The paper draws on research which suggests that the term ‘parent’ hides the fact that mothers are the ones generally perceived as having responsibility for their children and their relationship with school. It contends that the use of the term ‘parent’, in de-gendering the contribution of the mother, negates the voice of personal experience and prioritises the professional and expert voice. The lack of experiential knowledge is seen as especially important when children and their families are perceived as ‘different’ for example disabled children and children labelled as having special educational needs (SEN). The corollary to this argument is, of course, that while the term ‘parent’ negates the voices of mothers, it also negates the voices of fathers, despite research which strongly suggests the importance of their different but significant contribution in the lives of their children

Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2007.00467.x
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1987). (eds.) Women and Education: a Canadian Perspective,
  2. (2000). A Feminist Sociology of family life: family and education
  3. (2000). A Personal Reflection on Research on Mothers and Education Paper presented at ESRC funded research seminar series: Parents and Schools: Diversity, Participation and Democracy at
  4. (1996). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology?’
  5. (1982). A Sociology of Special Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  6. (1999). Actively Seeking Inclusion.
  7. (2002). Adolescents’ perceptions of their fathers’ involvement: significance to school attitudes’, Psychology in the schools,
  8. (1992). Alone Together: Voices of Single Mothers.
  9. (1996). Bad-mouthing: The Language of Special Needs.
  10. (1991). Blinded by Family Feeling: Child Protection, Feminism and Countertransference,’
  11. (2000). Caring, Consuming and choosing: Parental choice policy for mothers of children with special educational needs’
  12. (2006). Childcare, choice and class practices: middle class parents and their children.
  13. (1995). Creating a space for absent voices: disabled women’s experience of receiving assistance with daily living activities,
  14. (2005). Degrees of choice: class, race, gender and higher education. Stoke-on-Trent:
  15. (1989). Democracy in the Kitchen: Regulating Mothers and Socialising Daughters.
  16. (1999). Disability, Human Rights and Education: Cross-Cultural Perspectives.
  17. (2000). Disability, The Family and Society: Listening to Mothers,
  18. (1999). Disabling Policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability,
  19. (1988). Draft Circular [1/89] Revisions of Circular 1/83.
  20. (2001). Education in a Post-Welfare Society,
  21. (1994). Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach,
  22. (1996). Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability.
  23. (2003). Every Child Matters. Green Paper. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
  24. (2003). Experiences of Special Education: Re-evaluating policy and practice through life stories.
  25. (1978). Family factors
  26. (2005). Fathering and Child Outcomes.
  27. (2005). Fathers and sons in and about education. Stoke-on-Trent:
  28. (2003). Fathers in Sure Start local programmes, Nottingham: DfES Publications Ref NESS/SF/004.
  29. (2002). Fathers’ involvement in their children’s literacy development
  30. (2001). Fathers’ involvement is crucial – a report to the ESRC (R000223309: Fathers’ involvement and outcomes in adolescence and adulthood, end of award report)
  31. (1999). Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability,
  32. (1986). Feminism, Motherhood and Medicine - Who Cares?’
  33. (2003). Focus on Fathering.
  35. (1993). Gender and Disability in J.Swain, V.Finklestein, S.French and M.Oliver (eds.) Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. London Sage.
  36. (2005). Good faith and effort?’ Perspectives on educational inclusion,
  37. (2000). Home-School Agreements: A True Partnership? Report of a research project for the Research and Information on State Education Trust (RISE).
  38. (2001). Home-School Agreements: a true partnership?’
  39. (1996). Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability,
  40. (2003). Inclusion, Participation and Democracy: What is the Purpose? Drodrecht:
  41. (1998). Involvements and Investments in Education: Mothers and Schools Journal for a just and caring education,
  42. (1998). Meeting Special Educational Needs: A Programme of Action,
  43. (2004). Mother-Teachers: Insights into Inclusion.
  44. (1992). Motherhood and Representation: The Mother in Popular Culture.
  45. (1991). Mothering Psychoanalysis,
  46. (1995). Mothers’ Involvement in Primary Schooling: The Influence of Social Class on Home-School Relations,
  47. (2000). Mothers’ Involvement in Their Children’s Schooling, Paper presented at
  48. (2005). Not so much a choice, more a battle of wills’
  49. (1996). Parents and Teachers: Power and Participation,
  50. (2001). Parents talk about how it feels to have a child with a cognitive disability’,European
  51. (1997). Parents Who Teach: Stories from Home and from School.
  52. (1993). Parents, Gender and Education Reform.
  53. (1987). Partnership in Action: Working with Parents in Preschool Centres,
  54. (2002). Peripheral Voices: parental involvement, social class and educational disadvantage’ in
  55. (1992). Personal and Political: a feminist perspective on researching physical disability, Disability, Handicap and Society.
  56. (1995). Power and Partnership
  57. (1998). Powerlessness in professional and parent partnerships’,
  58. (1991). Pride Against Prejudice,
  59. (1975). Psychoanalysis and feminism.
  60. (1986). Sexual Contradictions: psychology, psychoanalysis, and feminism,
  61. (1994). Social Constructions of Mothering: A Thematic Overview’
  62. (1996). Sociology and Disability: Some emerging issues
  63. (1978). Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People (The Warnock Report),
  64. (1987). Statements of intent: an assessment of reality’
  65. (2007). Stuff and nonsense?’ The Guardian,
  66. (2000). Telling Our own Stories: Reflections on family life in a disabling world. Sheffield: Parents with Attitude.
  67. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A feminist sociology. Milton Keynes:
  68. (1989). The Fantasy of the Perfect Mother,
  69. (1996). The politics of disability identity’
  70. (1994). The social and biological components of mental disorder: implications for services’ in
  71. (1993). The social construction of black womenhood in British educational research: towards a new understanding’,
  72. (1996). Towards an integrated theoretical framework for the research into special educational needs’ in
  73. (1999). Troubling Women: Feminism, Leadership and Educational Change.
  74. (2004). What predicts fathers’ involvement with their children? A prospective study of the impact of intact families,
  75. (1996). Working with Families of Children with Special Needs: Partnership and Practice.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.