Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: A study protocol

By Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Nicola Shaw, Claude Sicotte, Luc Mathieu, Yvan Leduc, Julie Duplantie, James Maclean and France Légaré
Topics: Study Protocol
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2673204
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies: Critical literature review of systematic mixed studies reviews in the health sciences.
    2. (2007). A: Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures. Med Gen Med
    3. (2006). Adoption of IT by GP/FMs: A 10 Country Comparison.
    4. (2004). Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical research (AHFMR), et al.: Systematic review of the social, ethical, and legal dimensions of genetic cancer risk assessment. AHFMR: Edmonton;
    5. (2003). Analyzing computer based patient records: a review of literature.
    6. (1997). Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature.
    7. (2002). Bottema BJ: A Delphi technique as a method for selecting the content of an electronic patient record for asthma.
    8. (2002). Building on Values: The Future of Health Care
    9. (2008). Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
    10. (2006). Canadian Health Services Research Foundation: Disseminating research. Finalizing the dissemination plan.
    11. (1994). Checklists for review articles. BMJ
    12. (2006). CR: Determining criteria for excellence in nurse practitioner education: use of the Delphi Technique. Nurs Outlook
    13. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research.
    14. (2005). DF: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ
    15. (2009). DW: Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenanceImplementation Science
    16. (2001). Eds, et al.: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual RAND publications;
    17. (2005). Ferlie E: Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.
    18. (2006). Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ
    19. (2008). Getting to the electronic medical record. CMAJ
    20. (1999). HR: Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA
    21. (2007). I: Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    22. (2006). ID: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci
    23. (2008). ID: Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns
    24. (2004). Implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in five family practice teaching units: an exploratory trial.
    25. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement.
    26. (2004). In pursuit of a safe Canadian healthcare system. Healthc Pap
    27. (2006). Infoway and Health Council of Canada: Beyond Good Intentions: Accelerating the Electronic Health Record in Canada.
    28. (2006). Infoway: End User Acceptance Strategy – Current State Assessment:
    29. Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review.
    30. (2006). Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    31. (2004). Lankton NK: Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health.
    32. Les théories sociales cognitives: Guide pour la mesure des variables et le développement de questionnaire. Sainte-Foy: Faculté des sciences infirmières,
    33. (2004). Listening for Direction II, National consultation on health services and policy issues for
    34. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis Thousand Oaks,
    35. (2004). Nohr C: Patient opinion–EHR assessment from the users perspective. Medinfo
    36. (2002). Opinion publique: Selon la population canadienne, quel est le rôle des technologies de l'information et des communications (TIC) dans le secteur de la santé?
    37. (2004). Ortiz E: Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging.
    38. (2007). P-G: Shared Decision Making in Canada: update, challenges and where next! Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich
    39. (2004). Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care.
    40. Plan 2006–07: Getting There – Canada's Electronic Health Record Evolves – creating healthy connections [http://www2.infoway-inforoute.ca/Documents/Busi ness%20Plan%2006-07%20EN.pdf]
    41. (1999). Predictors and mediators of successful long-term withdrawal from antihypertensive medications. TONE Cooperative Research Group. Trial of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Elderly. Arch Fam Med
    42. (2003). Prokosch HU: Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record.
    43. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res
    44. (1996). Relevance reconsidered '96. In Information science: integration in perspective Royal
    45. (2004). SD: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manage
    46. (2006). Shekelle PG: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med
    47. (2007). Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health.
    48. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field.
    49. (2004). T: A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? Int J Qual Health Care
    50. (2003). Terasawa E: Use and Adoption of Computer-Based Patient Records. Care Science
    51. (1969). The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion
    52. (1995). The Diffusion of innovations 4th edition.
    53. (2004). The electronic health record: a leap forward in patient safety. Healthc Pap
    54. (2005). Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.