Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis

By Siebe B. van Albada and Pieter Rein ten Wolde

Abstract

Push–pull networks, in which two antagonistic enzymes control the activity of a messenger protein, are ubiquitous in signal transduction pathways. A classical example is the chemotaxis system of the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ regulate the phosphorylation level of the messenger protein CheY. Recent experiments suggest that both the kinase and the phosphatase are localized at the receptor cluster, and Vaknin and Berg recently demonstrated that the spatial distribution of the phosphatase can markedly affect the dose–response curves. We argue, using mathematical modeling, that the canonical model of the chemotaxis network cannot explain the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. We present a new model, in which a small fraction of the phosphatase is localized at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the phosphatase at the cluster has a higher binding affinity for the messenger protein and a higher catalytic activity than the phosphatase in the cytoplasm. This model is consistent with a large body of experimental data and can explain many of the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. More generally, the combination of differential affinity and catalytic activity provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals that could be exploited in other two-component signaling systems. If this model is correct, then a number of recent modeling studies, which aim to explain the chemotactic gain in terms of the activity of the receptor cluster, should be reconsidered

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2673030
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2003). A spatially extended stochastic model of the bacterial chemotaxis signaling pathway.
    2. (1996). Active site interference and asymmetric activation in the chemotaxis protein histidine kinase CheA.
    3. (2005). An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis response to multiple stimuli.
    4. (2004). An allosteric model for transmembrane signaling bacterial chemotaxis.
    5. (1981). An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems.
    6. (2000). An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells.
    7. (2002). Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.
    8. (2004). Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex.
    9. (2006). Changing cellular location of CheZ predicted by molecular simulations.
    10. (1996). Characterization of the CheAs/CheZ complex: a specific interaction resulting in enhanced dephosphorylating activity on CheYphosphate.
    11. (2006). Chemosensing in E. coli: two regimes in two-state receptors.
    12. (2003). CheZ phosphatase localizes to chemoreceptor patches via CheA-short.
    13. (2005). Design principles of a bacterial signalling network.
    14. (2001). Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli.
    15. (2004). Distributed subunit interactions in CheA contribute to dimer stability: a sedimentation equilibrium study.
    16. (2009). Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway.
    17. (2007). Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis.
    18. (2007). Enzyme localization can drastically affect signal amplification in signal transduction pathways.
    19. (1997). Genetic analysis of the catalytic domain of the chemotaxis-associated histidine kinase CheA.
    20. (1999). Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors.
    21. (2005). High mobility of carboxyl-terminal region of bacterial chemotaxis phos-phatase CheZ is diminished upon binding divalent cation or CheY-p substrate.
    22. (1993). Intermolecular complementation of the kinase activity of CheA.
    23. (2008). Kinetic characterization of catalysis by the chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ. Modulation of activity by the phosphorylated CheY substrate.
    24. (2000). Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions.
    25. (1996). Mutants with defective phosphatase activity show no phosphorylation-dependent oligomerization of CheZ. The phosphatase of bacterial chemotaxis.
    26. (1996). Oligomerization of the phosphatase CheZ upon interaction with the phosphorylated form of CheY.
    27. (2006). Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through assistance neighborhoods.
    28. (1999). Protein mobility in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli.
    29. (2003). Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: the role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species.
    30. (2000). Rapid phosphotransfer to CheY from a CheA protein lacking the CheY-binding domain.
    31. (1998). Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity.
    32. (1998). Regulation of phosphatase activity in bacterial chemotaxis.
    33. (2005). Simulating biochemical networks at the particle level and in time and space: Green’s function reaction dynamics.
    34. (2004). Single-cell FRET imaging of phosphatase activity in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis system.
    35. (2002). Structure and catalytic mechanism of the E. coli chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ.
    36. (2006). Ta ˘nase-Nicola, Ten Wolde PR
    37. (1984). The branch point effect.
    38. (1993). The short form of the CheA protein restores kinase activity and chemotactic ability to kinase-deficient mutants.
    39. (1995). The smaller of two overlapping CheA gene products is not essential for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.