Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Multi-institutional Comparison of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Planning Strategies and Planning Results for Nasopharyngeal Cancer

By Sung Ho Park, Hee Chul Park, Suk Won Park, Do Hoon Oh, Youngmin Choi, Jeung Kee Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Won Park, Hyun Sook Suh, Rena Lee and Hoonsik Bae


The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning strategies for nasopharyngeal cancer among Korean radiation oncology facilities were investigated. Five institutions with IMRT planning capacity using the same planning system were invited to participate in this study. The institutions were requested to produce the best plan possible for 2 cases that would deliver 70 Gy to the planning target volume of gross tumor (PTV1), 59.4 Gy to the PTV2, and 51.5 Gy to the PTV3 in which elective irradiation was required. The advised fractionation number was 33. The planning parameters, resultant dose distributions, and biological indices were compared. We found 2-3-fold variations in the volume of treatment targets. Similar degree of variation was found in the delineation of normal tissue. The physician-related factors in IMRT planning had more influence on the plan quality. The inhomogeneity index of PTV dose ranged from 4 to 49% in Case 1, and from 5 to 46% in Case 2. Variation in tumor control probabilities for the primary lesion and involved LNs was less marked. Normal tissue complication probabilities for parotid glands and skin showed marked variation. Results from this study suggest that greater efforts in providing training and continuing education in terms of IMRT planning parameters usually set by physician are necessary for the successful implementation of IMRT

Topics: Original Article
Publisher: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (1989). Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method.
  2. (1991). Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function.
  3. (2003). Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys
  4. (2005). Impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost treatment on the lung-dose distributions for non-small-cell lung cancer.
  5. (2006). Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculations of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol
  6. (2001). Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.
  7. (2002). Intensity modulation technique using the complementary boost-fields for ethmoid sinus cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
  8. (2006). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the standard management of head and neck cancer: promises and pitfalls.
  9. (2002). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience.
  10. (2007). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a belly board for rectal cancer.
  11. (2007). Korean Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (KOSTRO). Current status of the infrastructure and characteristics of radiation oncology in Korea.
  12. (2003). Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.
  13. (2006). Preliminary results of a phase I/II study of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy for nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
  14. (2007). Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
  15. (1995). Radiation dose-response of human tumors.
  16. (2004). Recurrences near base of skull after IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: implications for target delineation in high neck and for parotid gland sparing.
  17. (2007). Reduce in variation and improve efficiency of target volume delineation by a computer-assisted system using a deformable image registration approach.
  18. (2002). Report of a study on IMRT planning strategies for ethmoid sinus cancer. Strahlenther Onkol

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.