Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Can Contextualization Increase Understanding During Man-Machine Communication? A Theory-Driven Study

By L.L Alpay, J Verhoef, D Te’eni, H Putter, P.J Toussaint and J.H.M Zwetsloot-Schonk

Abstract

The Internet offers unlimited possibilities for finding health information. However, the user is often faced with the problem of understanding it. Contextualization has a role to play in enhancing the user’s comprehension. We report on a study which addresses this issue, using a theoretical model of communication whose central theme is that of context. A randomized controlled experimental design was chosen, using as a test-bed the website SeniorGezond we had previously developed. The study was composed of a pre-test, the intervention with the website and a post-test. Participants (n=40) were randomly assigned to exposure or no exposure to contextualization with the website. Results show that contextualization increases understanding for non-knowledgeable users. Furthermore, the participant’s cognitive style was found to be a significant factor on understanding. We also found that participants bring their own contexts such as social context and psychological context to support their understanding

Topics: Article
Publisher: Bentham Open
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2669642
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2005). A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaire. Eval Health Prof
    2. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. Consulting Psychologists Press,
    3. (2005). A review of web information seeking research: considerations of method and foci of interest. Information Research
    4. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach.
    5. (1995). Attribution and interpersonal perception. In: Tesser A Ed. Advanced social psychology.
    6. (2000). Contextualization in Computer-Mediated Communication: Theory informs design. Inf Sys Rev
    7. (2004). Easing internet access of health information for the elderly users: design considerations and usability. Health Informatics J
    8. (2002). Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: Age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study.
    9. (1998). Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: The precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing. Health Psychol
    10. (1997). Health online and the empowered medical consumer.
    11. Hjørland B.Information seeking behaviour. What should a general theory look like? New review of Information Behaviour research 2000; 1:
    12. (2000). Individual differences and information retrieval: implications on Web design. In: Mariani J and Harman D Eds.
    13. (1981). On user studies and information needs.
    14. (2006). Patient information needs: pre and post consultations.
    15. (2004). Researching the 'Informed Patient': the case of online information seekers.
    16. (2001). Review: A cognitive -affective model of organizational communication for designing IT.
    17. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
    18. (2000). Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychol Health
    19. (1987). Social Identity in Later Life: A Situational Approach to Understanding Old Age Stigma. Int J Aging Hum Dev
    20. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. Longmans,
    21. (2007). The Dutch website "SeniorGezond": An illustration of a road map for the informed patient.. Managed Care.
    22. (2002). The effects of topic familiarity on information search behavior.
    23. (2001). The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration. Organiz Sci
    24. (2001). The role of individual differences on Internet searching: an empirical study.
    25. (1998). What is understanding? In: Wiske MS Ed. Teaching for Understanding. Jossey-Bass

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.