Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Stereotactic large-core needle breast biopsy: analysis of pain and discomfort related to the biopsy procedure

By Judith M. Hemmer, Johannes C. Kelder and Hans P. M. van Heesewijk

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of variables such as duration of the procedure, type of breast tissue, number of passes, depth of the biopsies, underlying pathology, the operator performing the procedure, and their effect on women’s perception of pain and discomfort during stereotactic large-core needle breast biopsy. One hundred and fifty consecutive patients with a non-palpable suspicious mammographic lesions were included. Between three and nine 14-gauge breast passes were taken using a prone stereotactic table. Following the biopsy procedure, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire. There was no discomfort in lying on the prone table. There is no relation between type of breast lesion and pain, underlying pathology and pain and performing operator and pain. The type of breast tissue is correlated with pain experienced from biopsy (P = 0.0001). We found out that patients with dense breast tissue complain of more pain from biopsy than patients with more involution of breast tissue. The depth of the biopsy correlates with pain from biopsy (P = 0.0028). Deep lesions are more painful than superficial ones. There is a correlation between the number of passes and pain in the neck (P = 0.0188) and shoulder (P = 0.0366). The duration of the procedure is correlated with pain experienced in the neck (P = 0.0116) but not with pain experienced from biopsy

Topics: Breast
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2668619
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2005). An audit of pain/discomfort experienced during image-guided breast biopsy procedures.
    2. (2000). Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium.
    3. (2003). Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.
    4. (2004). Core needle biopsy (CNB) as a diagnostic method for breast lesions: comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA).
    5. (2002). Diagnosing non-palpable breast disease: short-term impact on quality of life of large-core needle biopsy versus open breast biopsy.
    6. (2007). Helbich Th, Schreer I
    7. (1999). Image-guided breast biopsy: analysis of pain and discomfort related to technique.
    8. (2003). Minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy with 11-gauge needles—patient acceptance and effect on follow-up imaging findings.
    9. (2002). Preferential use of sonographically guided biopsy to minimize patient discomfort and procedure time in a percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy program.
    10. (2003). van Hove E, de Schepper A

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.