Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Choice of Fixative Is Crucial to Successful Immunohistochemical Detection of Phosphoproteins in Paraffin-embedded Tumor Tissues

By Janine A. Burns, Yuan Li, Carol A. Cheney, Yangsi Ou, Laura L. Franlin-Pfeifer, Nelly Kuklin and Zhi-Qiang Zhang

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is frequently used as an indicator of cellular signaling activity. Elevated phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase receptors plays an important role in cancer pathogenesis. However, phosphoproteins are usually poorly preserved in clinical tissue samples that are routinely fixed in 10% formalin. Nonetheless, in oncology clinical trials, use of phosphoproteins as biomarkers has been considered to be of great value in evaluating the effectiveness of a given drug candidate. Therefore, it is worthy of investigating whether alternative fixatives would improve the preservation of phosphoproteins in tissue. We compared the IHC staining of a number of phosphoproteins in xenograft and human surgical tumor tissues fixed in three different fixatives: 10% formalin, 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and Streck’s tissue fixative (STF). We found that STF significantly enhanced the staining intensity of phosphoproteins compared with 10% formalin or 4% PFA. STF fixative also showed superiority of preservation of phosphoproteins in human surgical samples. Our results indicate that the choice of fixative could significantly affect the usability of clinical tissue samples for evaluating phosphoprotein by IHC. (J Histochem Cytochem 57:257–264, 2009

Topics: Article
Publisher: Histochemical Society
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2664939
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.