Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Primary prevention with the ICD in clinical practice: not as straightforward as the guidelines suggest?

By F.A.L.E. Bracke, L.R.C. Dekker, P.H. van der Voort and A. Meijer

Abstract

At first sight, guidelines for implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction seem unambiguous. There are clear cut-off values for ejection fraction, and functional class. However, determination of the ejection fraction itself is not unambiguous, and other risk factors for sudden death that may have a profound effect on risk are not used for decision-making. Furthermore, to obtain a clinically significant impact on survival, expected longevity is important as it can greatly compromise the benefit in elderly patients but underestimate the long-term potential of ICD therapy in younger patients. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:107-10.

Topics: Review Article
Publisher: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2659863
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.