Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comparison of methods for estimating the nucleotide substitution matrix

By Maribeth Oscamou, Daniel McDonald, Von Bing Yap, Gavin A Huttley, Manuel E Lladser and Rob Knight
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2655096
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1999). A nonhyperthermophilic common ancestor to extant life forms. Science
    2. (1996). Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria.
    3. BC: A model of evolutionary change in proteins.
    4. (1999). Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions.
    5. (2001). Crandall KA: Selecting models of nucleotide substitution: an application to human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). Mol Biol Evol
    6. (2005). Different Versions of the Dayhoff Rate Matrix. Mol Biol Evol
    7. (1996). DT: Using Evolutionary Trees in Protein Secondary Structure Prediction and Other Comparative Sequence Analysis.
    8. (2003). Estimating changes in mutational mechanisms of evolution.
    9. (2007). Estimation of phylogeny and invariant sites under the general Markov model of nucleotide sequence evolution. Syst Biol
    10. (2005). Estimation of Phylogeny Using a General Markov Model. Evol Bioinf Online
    11. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature
    12. (1981). Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach.
    13. (1995). Full reconstruction of Markov models in evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency.
    14. (1997). General time-reversible distances with unequal rates across sites: mixing gamma and inverse Gaussian distributions with invariant sites. Mol Phylogenet Evol
    15. (1998). Goldman N: Models of molecular evolution and phylogeny. Genome Res
    16. (1982). Graur D: Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes.
    17. (1998). Inferring pattern and process: maximumlikelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol
    18. Inferring phylogenies
    19. (1995). Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. P r o c Na tl A ca d S c i US A
    20. (2001). Landweber LF: A simple model based on mutation and selection explains trends in codon and aminoacid usage and GC composition within and across genomes. Genome Biol
    21. (2004). Larkum AW: The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst Biol
    22. (2004). Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst Biol
    23. (2004). Modeling the impact of DNA methylation on the evolution of BRCA1 in mammals. Mol Biol Evol
    24. (1998). MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics
    25. (1999). Ochman H: Isochores result from mutation not selection. Nature
    26. On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition.
    27. (1995). On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol Biol Evol
    28. (1987). Origin and evolution of organisms as deduced from 5S ribosomal RNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol
    29. (1997). Phylogenetic inference: how much evolutionary history is knowable? Mol Biol Evol
    30. (2003). Pollock DD: Likelihood analysis of asymmetrical mutation bias gradients in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. Genetics
    31. (1987). Statistical Analysis of Hominoid Molecular Evolution. Stat Sci
    32. (1998). Substitution bias, rapid saturation, and the use of mtDNA for nematode systematics. Mol Biol Evol
    33. (2002). Sueoka N: Asymmetric directional mutation pressures in bacteria. Genome Biol
    34. (2006). Using the nucleotide substitution rate matrix to detect horizontal gene transfer.
    35. (2002). Wide intra-genomic G+C heterogeneity in human and chicken is mainly due to strand-symmetric directional mutation pressures: dGTP-oxidation and symmetric cytosine-deamination hypotheses. Gene

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.