Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: a survey of scientists and study participants

By Rachel Morello-Frosch, Julia Green Brody, Phil Brown, Rebecca Gasior Altman, Ruthann A Rudel and Carla Pérez
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2654440
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. A Present for Life: Hazardous chemicals
  2. A Survey of Chemicals in the Blood of European Ministers
  3. (2005). Advances in risk assessment and communication. Annu Rev Public Health
  4. (2005). American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH): TLVs and BEIs based on the documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices
  5. (2004). Arcury TA: Reporting pesticide assessment results to farmworker families: development, implementation, and evaluation of a risk communication strategy. Environ Health Perspect
  6. (1997). Biomarkers: coming of age for environmental health and risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol
  7. (2006). Biomonitoring: is body burden relevant to public health? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
  8. (2006). California Environmental Contaminant Biomonitoring Program.
  9. (2001). CDC unveils first report on toxins in people. JAMA
  10. (2009). Choosing ignorance in the manufacture of toxic products. Cornell Law Rev 1997, 82:773-855.Environmental Health
  11. (2005). Citizens, science, and data judo: leveraging community-based participatory research to build a regional collaborative for environmental justice in southern california.
  12. Communicating human biomonitoring results to ensure policy coherence with public health recommendations: analysing breastmilk whilst protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding. Environ Health 2008, 7(Suppl 1):S6.
  13. (2005). Disclosing individual results of clinical research implications of respect for participants. JAMA
  14. (2003). Disease Control and Prevention: Second National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals.
  15. (1999). Disease Control and Prevention: The First National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals.
  16. (2005). Disease Control and Prevention: Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals.
  17. (2002). Dust: a metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization. Environ Health Perspect
  18. (2005). et al.: Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study: introduction. Environ Health Perspect
  19. (1991). Ethical considerations and responsibilities when communicating health risk information.
  20. (1996). Ethical issues in the interaction with subjects and disclosure of results.
  21. Flame Retardants in the Bodies of Pacific Northwest Residents: A Study of Toxic Body Burdens [ h t t p : / / w w w . s i g h t line.org]
  22. Girls' Body Burden of Hormone-Altering Cosmetics Chemicals [http://www.ewg.org/book/export/html/26953]
  23. (2004). Health risk communication using comparative risk analyses.
  24. (2004). Human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: measuring chemicals in human tissues is the "gold standard" for assessing exposure to pollution. Am Sci
  25. (2004). Human genetics, environment, and communities of color: ethical and social implications. Environ Health Perspect
  26. (2007). Identifying environmental health risks in consumer products: non-governmental organizations and civic epistemologies. Public Understand Sci
  27. (2006). Inadequate prenatal care and elevated blood lead levels among children born in Providence, Rhode Island: a population-based study. Public Health Rep
  28. (1994). Initiating empowering research?
  29. (1989). Interpretation and communication of the results of medical field investigations.
  30. (1995). Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami: Communicating about Contaminants in Country Foods: The Experience of Aboriginal Communities
  31. Is It In Us: Toxic trespass, Regulatory Failure & Opportunities for Action [http://isitinus.org/project.php]
  32. (1996). JP: Our Stolen Future.
  33. (2001). JW: Researcher and researched–community perspectives: toward bridging the gap. Health Educ Behav
  34. (1999). Kosatsky T: Communicating their individual results to participants in an environmental exposure study: insights from clinical ethics. Environ Res
  35. (2003). Lessons from the polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs): precautionary principle, primary prevention, and the value of community-based body-burden monitoring using breast milk. Environ Health Perspect
  36. (2007). LM: Improving disclosure and consent: "Is it safe?": new ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals.
  37. (2002). LM: Reporting needs for studies of environmental chemicals in human milk.
  38. Measuring Chemicals in People–What Would You Say? A
  39. (2000). Meironyté D: Certain organochlorine and organobromine contaminates in Swedish human milk in perspective of past 20–30 years. Chemosphere
  40. (2006). National Academy of Sciences: Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals.
  41. (1979). of Health: The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research
  42. (2004). Orloff KG: Biomarkers of exposure in community settings.
  43. Ozonoff D: A new spin on research translation: the Boston consensus conference on human biomonitoring. Environ Health Perspect
  44. (2003). Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust. Environ Sci Technol
  45. (2008). Pollution comes home and gets personal: women's experience of household chemical exposure. J Health Soc Behav
  46. (2004). Pollution gets personal. Science
  47. (1972). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,
  48. (2004). Prenatal insecticide exposures and birth weight and length among an urban minority cohort. Environ Health Perspect
  49. (1999). Protecting communities in research: philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics
  50. (2008). Reporting individual test results of environmental chemicals in breastmilk: potential for premature weaning. Breastfeeding Medicine
  51. (2004). Researching patient-professional interactions.
  52. (2008). Risk communication and human biomonitoring: which practical lessons from the Belgian experience are of use for the EU perspective? Environ Health
  53. (2005). S: Biomonitoring: what communities must know. Race, Poverty and Environment
  54. (2003). S: Knowledge in Action: Canadian Arctic Contaminants Assessment Report II. Ott a w a , Canada: Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development;
  55. (2006). Social movements in health: responses to and shapers of a changed medical world.
  56. The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community based participatory research and related participatory traditions.
  57. (1985). The epidemiologic basis for the notification of subjects of cohort studies.
  58. (1997). The politics of reproductive hazards in the workplace: class, gender, and the history of occupational lead exposure.
  59. The Pollution
  60. The Pollution in Newborns [ h t t p : /
  61. The Pollution Within [http://www7.nationalgeo graphic.com/ngm/0610/feature4/]
  62. (2002). The social context of science: cancer and the environment. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci
  63. Toxic Nation: A Report on Pollution
  64. (1983). Toxic waste uproar: a community history.
  65. (2004). Trespass Against Us: Dow Chemical and the Toxic Century.
  66. (2000). Vartiainen T: Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in placenta and human milk. Organohalogen Compounds
  67. (2005). What's in You? Oakland Tribune.
  68. (2002). Will biomonitoring change the way we regulate toxic chemicals? J Law Med Ethics
  69. (2000). Worried locals seek blood testing: Richmond neighbors fear toxic contaminants. San Francisco Chronicle.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.