Antimicrobial resistance patterns among aerobic Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients in intensive care units: results of a multicenter study in Russia

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns among aerobic Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in different parts of Russia.MethodsDuring 1995–96, 10 Russian hospitals from different geographic areas were asked to submit 100 consecutive Gram-negative isolates from patients with ICU-acquired infections. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 12 antimicrobials were determined by Etest and results were interpreted according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines.ResultsIn total, 1005 non-duplicate strains were obtained from 863 patients. The most common species were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28.8%), Escherichia coli (21.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%), Proteus mirabilis (9.7%), Enterobacter spp. (8.2%) and Acinetobacter spp. (7.7%). High levels of resistance were seen to second- and third-generation cephalosporins, ureidopenicillins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and gentamicin. The most active agents were imipenem (no resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter spp. and Acinetobacter spp., 7% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), amikacin (7% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., 4% in Enterobacter spp., 1% in Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, no resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae) and ciprofloxacin (15% resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5% in Enterobacter spp. and Proteus mirabilis, 2% in Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1% in Escherichia coli).ConclusionsSecond- and third-generation cephalosporins, ureidopenicillins, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and gentamicin cannot be considered as reliable drugs for empirical monotherapy for aerobic Gram-negative infections in ICUs in Russia