AbstractWe define a semantics for negation as failure in logic programming. Our semantics may be viewed as a cross between the approaches of Clark [5] and Fitting [7]. As does [7], our semantics corresponds well with real PROLOG in the standard examples used in the literature to illustrate problems with [5]. Also, PROLOG and the common variants of it are sound but not complete for our semantics. Unlike [7], our semantics is constructive, in that the set of supported queries is recursively enumerable. Thus, a complete interpreter exists in theory, although we point out that there are serious difficulties in building one that works well in practice
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.