Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Demanding growth in Scotland: why Scotland needs a recovery plan based on growth and innovation

By James Meadway and Juan Mateos-Garcia

Abstract

After a decade of continuous growth, the UK economy is facing a recession of exceptional severity. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) forecasts a 2.8 per cent contraction in UK Gross Domestic Product over 2009, and fears that the world economy could shrink for the first time since the 1930s.\ud \ud In Scotland, the economy is projected to experience its worst recession since 1980, shrinking by 0.4 per cent in 2009, before growing again by 1.5 per cent in 2010. At the heart of this recession is the collapse of the financial services industry, with bank failures and nationalisations on a scale not seen for decades. New, tighter regulations on financial institutions are being imposed worldwide in response.\ud \ud But these finance and business service industries were central to the UK's relative prosperity, fuelling economic growth and providing hundreds of thousands of jobs. From 2000 to 2007, financial services added 15 per cent to annual GDP growth.\ud \ud But finance will not save us in the future. The challenge facing the UK economy is now to find the new sources of growth that will drive prosperity over the coming years. The knock-on effects of the global financial crisis are hitting Britain's non-financial businesses hard. Reduced business lending and lower spending is hitting British industry, sparking a chain reaction of distress, with industries from car manufacturers to shoe-makers seeking government help.\ud \ud The Scottish Government has identified long-term challenges to Scotland's economy and society. These include boosting Scotland's growth, productivity, population and participation, and in delivering on the desired characteristics of growth - solidarity, cohesion and sustainability.Sitting idly by in the face of the worst recession of modern times is not an option. But bailing out industries piecemeal is no better.\ud \ud A coordinated approach is clearly preferable. The trouble, however, is that ‘industrial policy' carries with it a heavy history. It is redolent of failed attempts to boost post-war British manufacturing, a process of ‘picking winners' that rarely came good.\ud \ud NESTA argues that there is a better option

Topics: L100 Economics, N215 Change and Innovation
Publisher: NESTA
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.brighton.ac.uk:6260

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). 3m to fund ‘UK Centre for Computer Games Excellence’
  2. (2007). a 1 per cent increase in UK Renewables Obligation prices increases renewable adoption by 1.5 per cent; a 1 per cent increase in German ‘feed-in tariff’ prices increases renewables adoption by 3.9 per
  3. A conservative estimate based on a limited definition of the sector. Recent analysis by BERR suggests that a wider definition of the Green Economy could account for a larger market and even more employment – potentially 1,000,000 jobs.
  4. (2006). A Policy for Industrial Champions: from picking winners to fostering excellence and the growth of firms.’
  5. (2008). Attacking the Recession: how innovation can fight the downturn.’
  6. (2002). Cold War Armory: military contracting in Silicon Valley. doi
  7. (2007). Demanding Innovation: lead markets, public procurement and innovation.’ doi
  8. (2009). Digital Britain: interim report.’ London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
  9. (2006). DTI Occasional Paper No.6: Innovation in the UK: indicators and insights.’ doi
  10. (1999). Embracing Defeat: Japan in the wake of World War doi
  11. (2007). example, Lord Sainsbury
  12. Figures from French Ministry of Culture and Communications.
  13. (1989). Flexible specialisation and the competitive failure of British manufacturing. doi
  14. (2009). For example, in the last year the R&D spending of the US S&P 500 declined 13 per cent.
  15. For example, Manchester Independent Economic Review (forthcoming) ‘Inward Investment in
  16. (2008). Games Impact, Part 3: looking at the indirect economic influence of the UK games industry.’ Oxford: Oxford Economics. Available at: http://www.developmag.com/interviews/289/
  17. (2008). Games UP? Brief No.5: Growing the Economic Contribution of the Industry.’ London: Games UP?
  18. (2009). Getting Up To Speed: making super-fast broadband a reality.’
  19. (2008). Global Entertainment and Media Outlook 2008-2012.’
  20. (2008). Glover Review International Workstream.’
  21. (1981). Industrial policies in Britain,
  22. (2004). Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century.’ doi
  23. (2007). Innovation in UK Cities.’
  24. (1986). Lead Users: a source of novel product concepts. doi
  25. (2008). Level Up - Building a Stronger Games Sector.’
  26. (2013). Market size and turnover figures not available, but NESTA estimates a contribution to GDP from the creative industries of £85 billion by
  27. (2003). Picking Winners? From technology catch-up to the space race in Japan.’ doi
  28. (2008). Raise the Game Report.’ Available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/raise-the-game-report/
  29. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition doi
  30. (1999). Renewable Energy Policy Outside the United States.’ Issue Brief #14. Washington, DC: Renewable Energy Policy Project,
  31. (2006). Secrets of the World’s Largest Seed Capital Fund.’ Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Business Research.
  32. (1999). Sources of Industrial Leadership: studies of seven industries.’ Cambridge: doi
  33. (2008). The costs of deploying fibre-based nextgeneration broadband infrastructure: final report for the Broadband Stakeholders Group.’ London: Broadband Stakeholders Group.
  34. (2008). The Failure of Market Failure: towards a 21st century Keynesianism.’
  35. (2006). The Firm as a Collaborative Community: reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy.’ Oxford: doi
  36. (1999). The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: interactions amongst organisational, scientific and institutional change. doi
  37. (2005). The Trillion Dollar Challenge: principles for profitable convergence.’ London: Deloitte and Touche. doi
  38. (2002). This figure from £22 billion market health spend, plus estimate for growth in NHS budget to 2013, and using estimated current use of NHS budget by the elderly to scale figure. Taken from Wanless,
  39. This figure refers to growth since 2007, the last for which data is consistently available.
  40. (2008). Total Innovation: Why harnessing the hidden innovation in high-technology sectors is crucial to retaining the UK’s innovation edge.’
  41. (2001). Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System: a network approach.’
  42. (2007). Transforming Government Procurement.’ London: HM Treasury. doi
  43. (2009). UK gloom risks clouding real picture.’
  44. (2002). UK industrial policy: old tunes on new instruments? doi
  45. (2009). Venture Capital Fundraising Activity Slows in 2008.’ London: NESTA. Endnotes 16 Demanding Growth in Scotland: Why Scotland needs a recovery plan based on growth and innovation
  46. (2009). World Economic Outlook Update.’ Washington, D.C: IMF. State for Trade and Industry, to the American Chamber of Conference,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.