Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Translation quality assessment: an application of a rhetorical model

By MAM Barghout

Abstract

Translation quality assessment is a fast growing sub-field of\ud Translation Studies. It focuses on the inter-relationships between the\ud text translated from (ST) and the text translated into (TT). These\ud inter-relationships involve the lexis, grammar, syntax, and semantics\ud of both texts. Unlike sentences in isolation, texts are context-bound.\ud Distinctions between text and sentence are made. Text-bound\ud translation can only be conducted and assessed within the domain of\ud text-linguistics.\ud Assessment of translation quality should be based on a definable,\ud applicable, and testable model which, in turn, should be based on a\ud sound, comprehensive theory of translation. Current models for\ud translation emphasite one aspect against other aspects. For instance,\ud the grammatical model focuses on the linguistic aspect of translation.\ud The cultural model, on the other hand, highlights the communicative\ud aspect whereas the interpretive model concentrates on the pragmatic\ud aspect of translation. Such artificial compartmentalization is alien\ud to the nature of translation. As a process translation, in fact,\ud involves the integrated synthesis of the above aspects.\ud This theris presents a model for translation quality assessment\ud based on a sound theory of translation which comprehends the\ud philosophical (pragmatic), communicative (cross-cultural), and semiotic\ud (linguistic) aspects of langauge. Since translation is a semantic entity, our model - which we label 'rhetorical' - focuses on the\ud concept of 'meaning shifts' according to which the meaning of a text is\ud classifiable into obligatory, extended, and accessory meanings. This\ud does not suggest that the semantic structures of a text exist in a\ud state of utter un-relatedness. On the contrary, they survive in the\ud form of inter-related layers within the macro-structure of the text.\ud The relative dominance of any of the three meaning categories\ud determines the type of text.\ud According to this model, texts are broadly classified into\ud literary, non-literary, and hybrid texts. In a literary text, extended\ud and accessory meanings abound leaving a tiny room for obligatory\ud meaning. In non-literary texts, on the other hand, extended and\ud accessory meanings recede to the background leaving the obligatory\ud meaning in the foreground. In hybrid or fuzzy texts, semantic\ud structures are disproportionately distributed with no dominance of any\ud specific category. The topic and scope of a hybrid text determine the\ud volume of extended and accessory meaning in relation to obligatory\ud meaning.\ud The model is not intended for translation quality assessment only.\ud It has pedagogical implications as well. Translation students and\ud trainees can implement this model in textual analysis before they\ud embark on the process of translation. Phonological, grammatical,\ud syntactic, semantic, and lexical correspondences between SL and TL texts are identified before assessment of translation quality is\ud established

Topics: PB0001, mem_text_and_place
OAI identifier: oai:usir.salford.ac.uk:2083

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1970) 'The Concept of Shift
  2. (1972) Some Aspects of Text-Grammar: A Study in Theoretical LinguisticSand Poetics, The
  3. (1974) Semantics: The Study
  4. (1988) A Textbook
  5. (1989) Pragmatics and Natural Language Learning, Lawrence
  6. (ed.), (1977), Translating Literature: The German Tradition from Luther
  7. (ed.), (1979), Sociolinguistics: Aspects of Language Learning
  8. (ed.), (1979), Textual Strategies: Perspectives in
  9. (ed.), (1984), Translation: Literary. Linguistic and
  10. (ed.), (1988), The
  11. (eds.), (1986), Modern Literary Theory: A
  12. (trans.), (1967), Modern Arabic
  13. (trans.), (1985), Sahih Al-Bukhari, (A Collection of
  14. 1650-1800,
  15. A Basic Maxim for Practical Translation', The
  16. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics,
  17. A Text-Typological Approach to Syllabus Design in Advanced Language Teaching, The
  18. A, (1923), The Meaning
  19. A, (1976), A Dictionary for the Analysis of
  20. A, (1980), Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to
  21. A, (1981), Language, Meaning
  22. A, (1981), The Third Language: Recurrent Problems of Translation
  23. Abdus-Sabour, (1986), Al-Arabiyya: Lughat al-Ulu'm wa
  24. al-., (1911), Dala'il al-ijaz fi Ilm al-Ma'ni, (Arabic Semantics),
  25. and
  26. B, (1944), Introduction to Embryonic Development, Allen and
  27. (1982). Bilingualism: Basic Principles, Multilingual Matters Ltd,
  28. Brace
  29. C, (1969), The Theory and Practice
  30. C, (1976), Dictionary of Language
  31. C, (1988), From Syntax
  32. Catalogue),
  33. Centre,
  34. Christopher, (1982), Deconstruction: Theory
  35. Context,
  36. D, (1948), Aspects
  37. de
  38. de., (1986), From One Language
  39. den, (1978), Literature
  40. Discourse/Text Linguistics in the Training of Interpreters, a paper
  41. Dr, (1983), Muqaddima lit-Takween al-Ganini, an Arabic translation
  42. E, (1964), Towards a Science of Translating with Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in
  43. Everyman,
  44. (1978). Factors in a Theory of Poetic Translating,
  45. g doi
  46. G, (1970), Linguistics and
  47. G, (1975), After Babel: Aspects of Language doi
  48. G, (1979), The True Interpreter: A History of Translation Theory and Practice in
  49. G, (1980), In Search of A Theory of
  50. G, (1981), Translation Spectrum: Essays in Theory
  51. G, (1985), The Study of Language. doi
  52. H, (1962), Conveying Ideas: Fundamentals of
  53. H, (1979), Explorations in
  54. HATIM, B, Discourse Context and Text-Type: Contributions from Arabic Linguistics, a paper
  55. I, (1977), Scientific Technical Translation,
  56. I, (1987), The Social Context
  57. I, (1990), Discourse and
  58. Ibn- (1958), Al-Mugaddima, (The Introduction), Dar
  59. Inc.,
  60. (1984). Interpretation. Deconstruction and Ideology: An Introduction to Some Current Issues in Literary Theory,
  61. (1981). Introduction to TextLinguistics,
  62. J, (1975), Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism. Linguistics and the Study
  63. J, (1977), A Model for Translation
  64. K, (1980), Contrastive Textology: Comparative Discourse Analysis doi
  65. L, (1977), Introduction to Linguistic Concepts, Alfred A
  66. (1975). Linguistics and Literature: An Introduction to Literary Stylistics,
  67. Linguistics,
  68. (1971). Literary Style: A Symposium,
  69. (1938). Lord of Arabia: Ibn Saud, An Intimate Study of a King,
  70. Ltd,
  71. M H, 'Military Power, the Taiwan Relations Act, and US Interests in doi
  72. M, (1974), Semantics and
  73. M, (1977),
  74. M, (1988), Translation Studies: An
  75. M, (1989), Bilinguality
  76. M. (1977), An Introduction to
  77. N
  78. N, (1969), A Linguistic Guide
  79. N, (1975),
  80. N, (1976), Sociolinguistics: A Critical Survey of Theory
  81. of doi
  82. (1966). On Translation,
  83. P, (1981), Approaches
  84. (1975). Papers in Applied Linguistics,
  85. R, (1974), Structuralism in Literature:
  86. R, (1978), An Introduction
  87. R, (1979), Language as Ideology, Routledge and Kegan
  88. R, (1985), Language. Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a doi
  89. R, (1985), Narrative Fiction:
  90. S, (1970), The Nature of Translation: Essays on the Theory and Practice of
  91. S, (1977), Semantics: An Introduction to the Science
  92. S, (1986), Fann Al-Targamah, (The Art of Translation), published in Arabic in the 2nd Thousand
  93. Studies,
  94. Style,
  95. Stylistics,
  96. T, (1978), Psycholinguistics: An Introduction to the Psychology
  97. T, (1981), Introduction
  98. Tayeb, (1970), Doumat Wad Hamid wa Oissas Ukhra, (The Doum Tree of Wad Hamid and Other Stories),
  99. (1963). Ten Years of Translation,
  100. (1984). Text Production: Towards a Science of Composition,
  101. The
  102. (1963). The Critical Opinions of John Dryden: A Dictionary,
  103. (1961). The Meaning of Word,
  104. Theodore, (1957), The Art doi
  105. (1974). Translating the Word of God, Grand Rapids,
  106. (1976). Translation: Applications and Research,
  107. University
  108. Verlag,
  109. W, (1955), Dryden and the Art
  110. W, (1980), The Science of Translation: Problems
  111. W, (1984), Arabic-English Lexicon, The Islamic
  112. ya L53kii 4; IC • ;,-.‘2111 j! 1;-, t;J.Ii. . 4ot....<11 • L u, 0 • 4AL—ti t •

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.