Location of Repository

Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila

By Angela Schipanski, Ayse Yarali, Thomas Niewalda and Bertram Gerber


Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to use the dose–effect characteristics as behavioral “fingerprints” to dissociate reflexive and reinforcing functions. For glucose and trehalose, we uncover relatively weak preference. In contrast, for fructose and sucrose, preference responses are strong and the effects on feeding pronounced. Specifically, larvae are attracted to, and feeding is stimulated most strongly for, intermediate concentrations of either sugar: Using very high concentrations (4 M) results in weakened preference and suppression of feeding. In contrast to such an optimum function regarding choice and feeding, an asymptotic dose–effect function is found for reinforcement learning: Learning scores reach asymptote at 2 M and remain stable for a 4-M concentration. A similar parametric discrepancy between the reflexive (choice and feeding) and reinforcing function is also seen for sodium chloride (Niewalda T, Singhal S, Fiala A, Saumweber T, Wegener S, Gerber B, in preparation). We discuss whether these discrepancies are based either on inhibition from high-osmolarity sensors upon specifically the reflexive pathways or whether different sensory pathways, with different effective dose–response characteristics, may have preferential access to drive either reflex responses or modulatory neurons mediating internal reinforcement, respectively

Topics: Articles
Publisher: Oxford University Press
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2467463
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles



    1. (2002). Adult-like complexity of the larval antennal lobe of D. melanogaster despite markedly low numbers of odorant receptor neurons.
    2. (2005). Appetitive olfactory learning in Drosophila larvae: effects of repetition, reward strength, age, gender, assay type and memory span. Anim Behav.
    3. (2007). Architecture of the primary taste center of Drosophila melanogaster larvae.
    4. (2008). Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling.
    5. (2006). Light-induced activation of distinct modulatory neurons triggers appetitive or aversive learning in Drosophila larvae.
    6. (2004). Molecular neurophysiology of taste in Drosophila. Cell Mol Life Sci.
    7. (1998). Multiple sites of associative odor learning as revealed by local brain microinjections of octopamine in honeybees. Learn Mem.
    8. (2005). Octopamine-immunoreactive neurons in the brain and subesophageal ganglionofthehawkmothManducasexta.JCompNeurol.488:255–268.
    9. (1999). Pharmacological dissociation between the reinforcing, sensitizing, and response-releasing functions of reward in honeybee classical conditioning. Behav Neurosci.
    10. (2007). The Drosophila larva as a model for studying chemosensation and chemosensory learning: a review. Chem Senses.
    11. (1997). The neural basis of associative reward learning in honeybees. Trends Neurosci.
    12. (1969). The very hungry caterpillar.
    13. (2007). Two Gr genes underlie sugar reception in Drosophila.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.