The exclusion of competing one-way essential complements: implications for net neutrality

Abstract

peer reviewedWe analyze the incentives of internet service providers (ISPs) to break net neutrality by excluding competing one-way essential complements, i.e. internet applications competing with their own products. A typical example is the exclusion of VoIP applications by telecom companies offering internet and voice services. A monopoly ISP may want to exclude a competing internet app if it is of inferior quality and the ISP cannot ask for a surcharge for its use. Competition between ISPs never leads to full app exclusion but it may lead to a fragmented internet where only one ISP offers the application. We show that, both in monopoly and duopoly, prohibiting the exclusion of the app and surcharges for its use does not always improve welfare.ARC Competition and Innovatio

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Open Repository and Bibliography - Liège

redirect
Last time updated on 13/04/2017

This paper was published in Open Repository and Bibliography - Liège.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.