Quality of life following fistulotomy - short term follow-up

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anal fistula causes pain, discharge of pus and blood. Fistulotomy has the highest success, however, can risk continence; treatment balances cure with continence. This study assessed the impact of fistulotomy on Quality Of Life (QOL) and continence. METHODS: Patients selected for fistulotomy prospectively completed St Mark's Continence Score (full incontinence = 24) and Short Form - 36 questionnaires pre-operatively at two institutions with an interest in anal fistula, and reassessed 3 months post-operatively. RESULTS: There were 52 patients median age 44, range 19 - 82 years, 10 were women. Pre-operative continence scores were median 0, range 0 - 23, there was no significant difference compared to post-operative scores, median 1, range 0-24. Quality of life was significantly improved following fistulotomy in 4 of 8 domains: Bodily Pain (p<0.001); Vitality (p<0.01); Social Functioning (p<0.05); Mental Health (p<0.001) and returned to that of the general population. QOL for patients with intersphincteric fistula improved post fistulotomy, for those with trans-sphincteric fistula QOL remained the same. Data were further examined in two groups, with and without continence score deterioration. Where continence improved post-operatively, QOL improved in 3 domains; where continence deteriorated QOL also improved, in 2 domains (p<0.05). Patients with post-operative continence of <5 points had worse QOL than those scoring 4 or less. DISCUSSION: QOL at three months follow up significantly improved following fistulotomy where continence was maintained or a small reduction occurred

Similar works

This paper was published in UCL Discovery.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.