Article thumbnail

When research seems like clinical care: a qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results

By Fiona A Miller, Mita Giacomini, Catherine Ahern, Jason S Robert and Sonya de Laat
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2267198
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A grounded hermeneutic editing approach.
  2. (2005). A: Unblinding of trial participants to their treatment allocation: lessons from the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROPER). Clinical Trials
  3. An interview with Steven Narod [http:www.esi-topics.com/breast-cancer2005/interviews/Steven Narod.html]
  4. (2002). Appelbaum PS: The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Medical Care
  5. (2005). Architectures of genetic medicine: comparing genetic testing for breast cancer in the USA and the UK. Soc Stud Sci
  6. (2006). Best laid plans for offering results go awry.
  7. (2006). C: Returning genetic research results to individuals: Points to consider. Bioethics
  8. (2003). CA: Impact on survivors of retinoblastoma when informed of study results on risk of second cancers[see comment]. Medical & Pediatric Oncology
  9. Case study research. design and methods. Volume 5. Third edition.
  10. (1996). Commentary on the ASCO statement on genetic testing for cancer susceptibility:
  11. (1996). Commentary on the ASCO statement on genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: National Breast Cancer Coalition.
  12. (2004). Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants.
  13. Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.
  14. (2006). E: The Return of Research Results to Participants: Pilot Questionnaire of Adolescents and Parents of Children with Cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer
  15. (1998). Elbourne D: Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: Exploratory study. BMJ
  16. (2003). EP: Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results?
  17. (2002). EP: Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA
  18. (2004). EP: Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants.
  19. (2006). F: The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
  20. (2005). Fernandez CV: Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting. Blood
  21. (2005). FG: Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants. JAMA
  22. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods.
  23. (1999). Haites N: Cancer genetic services in Europe. Disease Markers
  24. (1999). Haites N: Ethical, social and economic issues in familial breast cancer: a compilation of views from the EC biomed II demonstration project. Disease Markers
  25. (2002). Informing participants of allocation to placebo at trial closure: postal survey. BMJ
  26. (2003). Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer.
  27. (1996). Kazak AE, Mitelman O: Informing subjects of epidemiologic study results. Children's Cancer Group. Pediatrics
  28. (2006). Letting the gene out of the bottle: a comment on returning individual research results to participants.
  29. (1982). Lidz C: The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.
  30. (2006). Luepker RV: Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
  31. (2006). Medicare's requirement for research participation as a condition of coverage is it ethical? JAMA
  32. (2000). Misusing informed consent: A critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results. Saskatchewan Law Review
  33. (1997). MJE: Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer: The process and content of informed consent. JAMA
  34. (1996). of Clinical Oncology: Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
  35. (2001). Ontario Cancer Genetics Network: The cooperative familial registry for breast cancer studies: design and first year recruitment rates in Ontario.
  36. Provincial Predictive Genetic Testing Service for Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Colon Cancer [http://
  37. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Third edition. Thousand Oaks,
  38. (2005). Reactions to treatment debriefing among the participants of a placebo controlled trial.
  39. (2006). Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views. BMJ
  40. (2004). Research ethics and misguided moral intuition.
  41. (2006). Rethinking respect for persons enrolled in research.
  42. (2000). S: Ontario familial colon cancer registry: methods and first year response rates. Chronic Diseases in Canada
  43. (2006). Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
  44. (2003). Weijer C: Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB: a Review of Human Subjects Research
  45. (2006). Wilfond BS: Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.