Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Asserting Plenary Power Over the \u22Other\u22: Indians, Immigrants, Colonial Subjects, and Why U.S. Jurisprudence Needs To Incorporate International Law

By Natsu Taylor Saito


Nelson Mandela reminded a joint session of the United States Congress in 1990 that \u22[tlo deny any person their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.\u27 Human rights law is a subset of international law designed to protect certain fundamental rights of individuals and of ethnic, religious, racial, and national minorities within states. It also encompasses the rights of peoples to self-determination. Since World War II the major world powers have acknowledged that these universal principles of human rights must be accepted as binding on all states, because the domestic laws that protect the rights of \u22insiders\u22 often fail to protect those regarded as \u22Other\u22 within the polity. The colonial legacy of the arbitrary imposition of state boundaries upon indigenous nations in almost every part of the world makes international human rights law particularly important

Topics: Law
Publisher: Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository
Year: 2015
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.