In recent years there has been extensive debate in the energy economics and policy\ud literature on the likely impacts of improvements in energy efficiency. This debate has focussed on the notion of rebound effects. Rebound effects occur when improvements\ud in energy efficiency actually stimulate the direct and indirect demand for energy in\ud production and/or consumption. This phenomenon occurs through the impact of the\ud increased efficiency on the effective, or implicit, price of energy. If demand is\ud stimulated in this way, the anticipated reduction in energy use, and the consequent\ud environmental benefits, will be partially or possibly even more than wholly (in the case\ud of ‘backfire’ effects) offset. A recent report published by the UK House of Lords\ud identifies rebound effects as a plausible explanation as to why recent improvements in\ud energy efficiency in the UK have not translated to reductions in energy demand at the macroeconomic level, but calls for empirical investigation of the factors that govern the\ud extent of such effects.\ud Undoubtedly the single most important conclusion of recent analysis in the UK, led by the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) is that the extent of rebound and backfire\ud effects is always and everywhere an empirical issue. It is simply not possible to\ud determine the degree of rebound and backfire from theoretical considerations alone,\ud notwithstanding the claims of some contributors to the debate. In particular, theoretical analysis cannot rule out backfire. Nor, strictly, can theoretical considerations alone rule out the other limiting case, of zero rebound, that a narrow engineering approach would imply.\ud In this paper we use a computable general equilibrium (CGE) framework to investigate\ud the conditions under which rebound effects may occur in the Scottish regional and UK\ud national economies. Previous work has suggested that rebound effects will occur even where key elasticities of substitution in production are set close to zero. Here, we carry out a systematic sensitivity analysis, where we gradually introduce relative price\ud sensitivity into the system, focusing in particular on elasticities of substitution in\ud production and trade parameters, in order to determine conditions under which rebound\ud effects become a likely outcome. We find that, while there is positive pressure for\ud rebound effects even where (direct and indirect) demand for energy is very price\ud inelastic, this may be partially or wholly offset by negative income and disinvestment\ud effects, which also occur in response to falling energy prices
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.