Article thumbnail


By Richard G. Walsh, Donn M. Johnson and John R. McKean


While issues in estimating nonmarket values continue to cause concern, resource economists have more reason now than ever before to be optimistic. More progress toward improved measurement has been made in the past six years than in the previous quarter century since development of the contingent valuation and travel cost methods. The new challenge is to learn how to adjust past studies to estimate nonmarket values for future policy analysis. The process involves developing an understanding of the important variables that explain the observed difference in estimates. This paper illustrates how the results thus far could be adjusted to develop some tentative estimates of the recreation-use value of Forest Service resources.Research Methods/ Statistical Methods, Resource /Energy Economics and Policy,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. A Bayesian Approach to Assessing the Robustness of Hedonic Property Value Studies."
  2. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity."
  3. A Simple, Positive SemiWalsh,
  4. Aggregation in Recreation Economics: Issues of Estimation and Benefit Measurement."
  5. and Procedures for Water and Related Land Resource Planning." Federal Register 38(Sept. 10, 1973):174, Part III.
  6. Department of the Interior. "Natural Resource Damage Assessments: Final Rule."
  7. (1983). Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies." Washington DC: Government Printing Office,
  8. (1989). Household Market Demand and Supply Comparisons for Outdoor Recreation." Draft General Tech. Rep., Southeastern Forest Experiment Station,
  9. (1977). Improved Procedures for Valuation of the Contribution of Recreation to National Economic Development." Water Resources Ctr.
  10. Neoclassical Foundations for Nonmarket Benefits Estimation."
  11. On-Site Samples' Regression: Problems of NonNegative Integers, Truncation, and Endogenous Stratification."
  12. (1987). President's Commission on Americans Outdoors. Americans Outdoors: The Legacy, The Challenge. Washington DC:
  13. Procedures for Evaluation of National Economic Development (NED) Benefits and Costs in Water Resources Planning."
  14. (1986). Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs. State College PA:
  15. Review of Outdoor Recreation Demand Studies with Nonmarket Benefit Estimates,
  16. (1988). Signals or Noise? Explaining the Variation in Environmental Benefit Estimates."
  17. (1988). Statistical Abstract of the United States,
  18. (1984). Summing Up: The Science ofReviewing Research. Cambridge MA:
  19. The Effects of Variable Omission in the Travel Cost Technique." Land Econ.
  20. (1984). The Integrative Research Review: A Systematic Approach. Beverly Hills CA:
  21. (1988). The Net Economic Value of Elk Hunting in Montana." Report by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks,
  22. (1989). The Value of Recreation on the National Forests: Nine Regions and Twelve Types of Primary Activity Trips." Draft, General Tech. Rep., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station,