Article thumbnail

Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region

By Amnon Frenkel


The growing interest in public policy contributing to the expansion of industrial innovation has become increasingly significant, resulting from the interrelationship between innovation, competitiveness, and economic growth. Thus, the identification of barriers and limitations hindering the success of innovation will define the principles on which efficient and successful public policy must be based. This paper presents the results of an empirical study aimed at identifying the most significant barriers to the development of innovation, as ascribed by industrial firms belonging to the hi-tech sector, alongside more traditional industries. The data was collected through a field survey of industrial firms located in the Northern region of Israel, covering two different sub-regions: the metropolitan core and the periphery. The study also investigated the differences between the industrial sectors (hi-tech vs. traditional and type of region (metropolitan vs. periphery) with regard to the importance ascribed to the various barriers. A considerable similarity was identified between the industrial sectors and the different regions investigated, with regard to the most significant factors acting as barriers that slow down or all together stop innovative projects. These findings could facilitate in the design of a comprehensive policy in order to minimize the negative impact of such barriers on the expansion of industrial innovation.

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (1979). A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and Trade”
  2. (1974). Agglomeration Potential: A Generalization of the Income Potential Concept.”
  3. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change,
  4. (1959). Anatomy of Metropolis,
  5. (1976). Are There Returns to Scale in City Size?” Review of Economics and Statistics 58:339-350. 26 Shefer,
  6. (2000). Can Regional Policy Affect Firms' Innovation Potential in Lagging Regions?”
  7. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy,
  8. (2001). Different Paths to Success? The Growth of the Electronics Sector in Ireland and Israel”, Environment and Planning C,
  9. (1986). Efficiency of Resource Usage and City Size.”
  10. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of
  11. (1997). Endogenous Technological Change, Long-Run Growth and Spatial Interdependence: A Survey.”
  12. (1994). Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics and History,
  13. (1993). Financial factors which Stimulate innovation”,
  14. (2001). Firms Characteristics, Location and Regional Innovation: A Comparison Between Israeli and German Plants”, Regional Studies (Forthcoming).
  15. (1995). Geography and Economic Theory.
  16. (1991). Geography and Trade,
  17. (1996). High Technology Firms and Metropolitan Locational Choice in Israel;
  18. (1996). How Much Can Regional Policy Increase Firms’ Innovation Capability?”, paper presented to the 36th European Congress of the Regional Science Association,
  19. (1997). Innovation and Strategy in Space: Towards a New Location Theory of the Firm”,
  20. (1991). Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives.
  21. (2000). Innovation, Public Policies and Locational Determinates of Hi-tech Industry: A Comparison between Israel and Ireland”.
  22. (1996). Innovative Firm Behavior and Local Milieu: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration,
  23. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth,
  24. (1998). Local Milieu and Innovativness: Some Empirical Results”
  25. Nijkamp (1997).“Spatial Dispersion of Technological Innovation: A Review.”
  26. (1985). Predicting Patterns of Diffusion of Process Innovation within Great Britain, paper presented to the Twenty-Fifth European Congress of the Regional Science Association,
  27. (1996). Productivity and the Density of economic Activity.
  28. (1991). Regional Economic Analysis of Innovation and Incubation Aldershort,
  29. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation",
  30. (2001). Targeting Industries for Regional Development
  31. (1997). Technological Innovation and Diffusion Models: A Review.”
  32. (1972). Technology and American Economic Growth,
  33. (1985). The Commercial Exploitation of Science by American Industry", In: Clarck,
  34. (1995). The Concept of Innovative Milieu and Its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions”,
  35. (1974). The Economics of Industrial Innovation,
  36. (1986). The Generation and Utilization of Technology: A Cross Industry Analysis". Paper presented at the Conference on "Innovation Diffusion",
  37. (1994). The Geography of Innovation. The Netherlands: Dordrecth,
  38. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth.”
  39. (1988). The Urban Incubator Hypothesis: Re-Vitalization of Metropolitan Areas?"
  40. (1982). Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of a Long Waves and Economic Development,
  41. (1995). Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth.
  42. (1988). Urban Development: Theory, Fact and Illusion.
  43. (1993). Venturing into Foreign Markets: The Case of small Services Firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,