Article thumbnail

Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages

By Liang Zhao and Joyce P. Jacobsen

Abstract

In The Bell Curve, Herrnstein and Murray (1994) claim, based on evidence from cross-sectional regressions, that differences in wages in the U.S. labor market are predominantly explained by general intelligence. Cawley, Heckman, and Vytlacil (1999), using evidence from random effects panel regressions, reject this claim, in part because returns to general intelligence vary by racial and gender subgroups in their results. In this article, we examine the regression methods used by both sides of the debate and conclude that neither is the appropriate method to analyze the NLSY data that both use. We introduce the Hausman-Taylor estimator to obtain consistent estimated coefficients on the time-invariant general intelligence-related variables and also extend the analysis up through 2002. While many additional socio-economic factors are important explanatory variables in determining the wage rate, the effect of general intelligence on wages is larger in the Hausman-Taylor specification for the 1979-1994 panel than in either the cross-sectional or random effects models, though it becomes statistically insignificant for the 1994-2002 panel. The Hausman-Taylor analysis also indicates no significantly different returns to intelligence by race or gender group.wages, cognitive ability, education

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A Reanalysis of The Bell Curve: Intelligence, Family Background,
  2. (1988). Efficient Estimation with Panel Data: An Empirical
  3. (2003). Estimating Farm Productivity Differentials Using Panel Data: The Hausman-Taylor Approach.”
  4. (2003). Fixed effects, random effects, or Hausman-Taylor? A pretest estimator.”
  5. (1996). Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth.
  6. (2005). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach.
  7. (2004). Labor Markets and Employment Relationships: A Comprehensive Approach.
  8. (1995). Lessons from the Bell Curve.”
  9. (1947). Multiple Factor Analysis: A Development and Expansion of The Vectors of The Mind.
  10. (1990). On Efficient Estimation with Panel Data: An Empirical
  11. (1974). Schooling, Experience and Earnings.
  12. (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Achievement.
  13. (1927). The Abilities of Man: Their Nature and Their Measurement.
  14. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.
  15. (1996). The Role of Pre-Market Factors
  16. (2005). Towards a New Trade Policy between the USA and Middle-East Countries: Estimating Trade Resistance and Export Potential.” The World
  17. (2005). Up in the Skies? The Relationship between Body Height and Earnings in