Article thumbnail

CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM

By Glyn Wittwer and Mark Horridge


The sharp increase in Australia's terms of trade since 2003-04 has dramatic regional and sectoral implications. Mining-intensive regions have gained from the jump in export prices. Import-competing sectors have faced greater competition both from falling import prices and due to rising demand for domestic factors from the mining sectors. The drought of 2006 will widen the gap between winning and losing regions. In Indonesia, even if we assume that the oil extraction sector is facing resource depletion, a long-run terms-of-trade improvement may result in aggregate consumption increasing should real GDP fall relative to the base case. The TERM framework is highly suitable for modelling Brazil and China, each with around 30 regions.Resource /Energy Economics and Policy,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A Multiregional, Multisectoral model of the Australian Economy with an Illustrative Application,
  2. (2005). Combining engineering-based water models with a CGE model”, chapter 2 in Productivity Commission, Quantitative tools for microeconomic policy analysis,
  3. (2005). Dynamic general equilibrium analysis of improved weed management in Australia's winter cropping systems,
  4. (2006). International Trade Price Indexes, Australia, catalogue 6457.0, (accessed online 29
  5. (2006). Market monitor, (accessed online 29
  6. (1987). The Australian economy in the very long run. In:
  7. (2005). Using a highly disaggregated multiregional single-country model to analyse the impacts of the 2002-03 drought on Australia,
  8. (2005). Water Trade in the Southern MurrayDarling Basin, The Economic Record 81(s1):s115-s127. TERM website: ( Wittwer G