Article thumbnail

Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Additional Information on Food Quality and Safety

By Terhi Latvala and Jukka Kola


Most quality properties of food products can be considered as credence characteristics, quality of which cannot be inferred before the purchase, and sometimes not even after the purchase. Our objective is to assess how much consumers are willing to pay (WTP) for meat products, of which e.g. origins and production practices are known, especially with regard to safety issues. Results indicate that 59 % of Finnish consumers are willing to pay more to get information about safety and quality of beef products. Consumers are most concerned with diseases caused by food of animal origin.beef, information, credence attributes, willingness to pay, Consumer/Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). A framework for analysing public and private food quality policy: meeting consumer requirements?
  2. (2000). An Analyst’s Guide to Willingness-to-pay for Use in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Consumer Interest Annual 46:128-133. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Foodstuffs Quality Management Group.
  3. (2001). Chain and Network science: A research Framework.
  4. (2000). Consumer Assessment of the Safety of Beef as the Point of Purchace: A Pan-European Study.
  5. (1996). Consumers willingness to pay for reductions in the risk of food poisoning in the UK.
  6. (2001). Elintarviketuotannon turvallisuuden ja etiikan ekonomiaa.
  7. (1993). Emerging Data Issues in Applied Food Demand Analysis.
  8. (1993). Food Safety/Food Quality Data. In
  9. (1973). Free Competition and Optimal Amount of Fraud.
  10. (1970). Information and Consumer Behaviour.
  11. (1995). Informational Issues for Principals and Agents in the ”Market” for Food Safety and Nutrition. In
  12. (2001). Kuluttajien informaatiotarpeet elintarvikkeiden turvallisuus- ja laatuominaisuuksista: tapaustutkimus naudanlihasta.
  13. (1998). Kuluttajien käsitykset lihasta ja liha-alasta – Laadullinen tutkimus. National Consumer Research Centre 14. Brief summary in English “Consumer views about meat and the meat sector – A qualitative study.”
  14. (1998). Kuluttajien mielipiteet elintarvikkeisiin liittyvistä terveysvaaroista ja elintarvikevalvonnasta. National Food Administration.
  15. (2001). Laatusopimusten ja –merkkien käyttö naudanlihan tarjontaketjussa.
  16. (2000). Puolet kuluttajista päättelee ruoan alkuperän joutsenlipusta.
  17. (1996). Regulatory Targets and Regimes for Food Safety: A Comparison of North American and European Approaches. In: The Economics of Reducing Health Risk from Food. Available:
  18. (1993). The demand for food safety. Market imperfections and the role of government.
  19. (1994). The evolution of credence goods: A transaction approach to product spesification and quality control.
  20. (1970). The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.
  21. (1999). The New Economics of Agriculture.
  22. (1996). Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products.