Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Can the EU anchor policy reform? The case of the Euro-Med Partnership

By Alfred Tovias and Mehmet Ugur


The emerging literature on ‘anchoring’ draws attention to\ud non-conventional benefits of regional integration arrangements, which include increased policy credibility. Nevertheless, this literature tends to view the anchoring of policy reform as an exogenously given option for a reforming country. We demonstrate that anchoring is an endogenously determined choice, which may guarantee neither optimal levels of policy reform nor effective anchoring unless the relevant contracts are both complete and incentive compatible. We examine the economic pillar of the Euro-Med Partnership (EMP) to ascertain the extent to which its contractual provisions satisfy these conditions. Our findings suggest that the EMP leaves too much room for discretion and does not internalize the positive externalities associated with policy reform. These findings enable us to elaborate on why the EU cannot be expected to function as an effective anchor for policy reform for its trading partners

Topics: JN
Publisher: Sage Publications
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). Adjusting to new realities: MENA, the Uruguay Round, and the EU-Mediterranean initiative,
  2. (1998). Aid, the Incentive Regime and Poverty Reduction’, World Bank Working Paper.
  3. (1995). Decision Making in Political Systems’, doi
  4. (2000). Differentiation and Association within the EuroMediterranean Area’,
  5. (1997). External Bindings and the Credibility of Reform’
  6. (2004). Hard and Soft Law
  7. Hoekman (1997a), ‘Overview’,
  8. Hoekman (1997b), ‘Egypt and the Partnership Agreement with the EU: The road to maximum benefits’,
  9. (1998). Impact of European Union Association Agreements on
  10. (2001). Institutional Determinants of IMF Agreements’,
  11. (2004). Legalisation, Trade Liberalisation and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note’,
  12. (1999). Regional Public Goods in International Assistance’
  13. (1985). Sequential Bargaining Mechanisms’,
  14. (1994). Strengthening the Mediterranean policy of the European Union: establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, Brussels, Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament,
  15. The EC's Contribution to Peace and Prosperity in the Mediterranean and the Middle East: Some Proposals’,
  16. (2001). The Emerging Euro-Mediterranean System, doi
  17. (2001). The Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade Area and Modernisation in the Maghreb’, doi
  18. The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership in the Year 2000, Second FEMISE Report (Marseille: Institut de la Mediterranée).
  19. (2001). The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Exporting Peace and
  20. (2001). The European Union and the Challenges of the Near Abroad ‘
  21. (2003). The IMF and Economic Development (Canbridge,
  22. (1999). The IMF’s Role in Structural Adjustment’,
  23. (2001). Welfare Economics
  24. (2000). What Explains the Success and doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.