Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Public and Private Standards for Food Safety and Quality: International Trade Implications

By Jill E. Hobbs

Abstract

This article examines the implications for the international trade environment of public and private standards for food safety and food quality. Public (mandatory) standards are a response to a perceived market failure and include mandatory risk assessment procedures, restrictions on harmful products, and labelling requirements. Disparate public standards create challenges for international trading partners and are dealt with through the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements. Private standards for food safety and quality are becoming a prominent feature of international food markets and include proprietary, consensus and third-party standards. The WTO has no jurisdiction over private standards. Key questions include whether private standards divert or reduce trade or whether they can be trade enhancing, and under what conditions. The implications for the WTO are discussed, and future trade policy research needs pertaining to the co-existence of public and private standards for food safety and quality are identified.food safety, GLOBALGAP, HACCP, mandatory standards, private standards, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, International Relations/Trade,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/90586

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). Association (AVMA). 2008a. Colorado will phase out gestation stalls and veal crates.
  2. (2008). Association (AVMA). 2008b. California voters call for changes in livestock housing.
  3. (2008). Consumer preferences and the international harmonization of organic standards.
  4. (2010). Dispute Settlement: Dispute DS382 United States – Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements, Summary of the dispute to date
  5. (1986). Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Control. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. (Chapter 9: What is transaction cost economics?
  6. (2005). Effects of tariffs and sanitary barriers on highand low- value poultry trade.
  7. (1999). Emerging public concerns in agriculture: Domestic policies and international trade commitments.
  8. (2010). Ethical Sourcing. http://www.walmartstores.com (accessed
  9. (2002). Ethics, domestic food policy and trade law: Assessing the EU animal welfare proposal to the WTO. Food Policy
  10. (2004). Food Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Open Global System. Washington DC:
  11. (2010). for a detailed examination of these issues.
  12. (2004). Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI).
  13. (2007). High animal welfare standards in the EU and international trade – How to prevent potential ‘low animal welfare havens’?
  14. (2005). Private agri-food standards: Implications for food policy and the agri-food system.
  15. (2005). Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries.
  16. (2006). See www.eurepgap.org and www.globalgap.org 5. For further discussion see Henson,
  17. (2009). Standards as barriers vs. standards as catalysts: Assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on US seafood imports.
  18. (2010). Tesco Nature’s Choice.
  19. (2002). The North American–European Union dispute over beef producing using growth hormones: A major test for the new international trade regime. The World Economy 25(2): 283-296. Jill E. Hobbs Estey Centre
  20. (2006). The Role of Public and Private Standards in Regulating International Food Markets. IATRC Summer Symposium, Food Regulation and Trade: Institutional Framework, Concepts of Analysis and Empirical Evidence.
  21. (2010). What is new in protectionism? Consumers, cranks and captives.
  22. (2008). World Trade Organisation http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/private_standards_june08_e/private_st andards_june08_e.htm (accessed February 4,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.