Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository


By Arie Arnon


The Restriction period, which began in England in 1797, marked a crucial turning point for both monetary theory and policy. The debates during the Restriction concerning the complicated relationship between inflation, the exchanges and monetary aggregates came to be known as the Bullionist Debate. The Bullionists were critical of the Bank of England and supported a return to convertibility, whereas the anti-Bullionists defended the Bank and were satisfied with the inconvertible system. Throughout the period, discussions fluctuated in intensity, as Jacob Viner (1937) and Frank W. Fetter (1965) pointed out, with the market price of gold. When the price of gold in terms of inconvertible notes was high, as in 1800-01 and in 1809-10, and the exchanges were bad, the controversy intensified. The first round in the debate started with a Bullionist argument published by Walter Boyd (1801) to which Francis Baring (1801), the anti-Bullionist, reacted; their intense exchange provides an historic context for examining and re-evaluating Henry Thornton's seminal contribution to monetary theory. The paper will argue that Thornton’s path breaking Paper Credit (1802) presents an innovative and consistent anti-Bullionist position, one that differs from that of Baring who accepted the Smithian Real Bills Doctrine for both convertible and inconvertible situations. Thornton, on the other hand, rejected the Real Bills Doctrine and more generally Smith’s monetary thinking as it applied to both convertible and inconvertible monetary arrangements. The fundamental idea behind Thornton's defense of the Bank of England and inconvertibility was the crucial role of the Bank in managing the monetary system under both currency regimes. After 1802, particularly as a member of the famous Bullion Committee, Thornton played an 3 important role on the side of the Bullionists that resulted in his being described by later scholars as a "moderate Bullionist." However, as I intend to show, his reserved support for convertibility during this period reflects his disappointment with the Bank directors, whose poor management skills and fundamental misunderstanding of the monetary system threatened the stability of the British economy. For this reason, the shift in Thornton's position may be better understood as a political and pragmatic response to an untenable situation rather than as a reversal of his theory or a principled rejection of an inconvertible, properly managed, regime.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1804), Notes on King in Thornton (1802\1939),
  2. (1873\1896) Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market,
  3. [?] (1801b) A Twelve-Penny Answer to a Three Shillings and Six-Penny Pamphlet,
  4. [?] (1801c) A Second Twelve-Penny Answer to a New (and Five Shillings) Edition of Three Shillings and Six-Penny Pamphlet, Intitled "A Letter on
  5. [Lord] (1804), Thoughts on the Effects of the Bank Restrictions, (2nd edition, first 1803),
  6. (1945). A History of Banking Theory,
  7. (1801). A Letter to the Right Honourable William Pitt on the Influence of the Stoppage of Issues
  8. (1985). A Reinterpretation of Classical Monetary Theory",
  9. (1981). Adam Smith as a Monetary Economist",
  10. An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain, (with an introduction by F.A. von Hayek),
  11. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,
  12. (1987). Banking Between the Invisible and Visible Hands: A Reinterpretation of Ricardo's Place Within the Classical School",
  13. (1967). Critical Essays in Monetary Theory,
  14. (1971). Henry Thornton and Classical Monetary Economics”,
  15. (1995). Henry Thornton and the Development of Classical Monetary Economics",
  16. (1978). Henry Thornton and the Development of Ricardo's Economic Thought”,
  17. (1995). Henry Thornton in the History of Economics: Confusions and Contributions”
  18. (1982). Henry Thornton: a mise au point”
  19. (1982). Henry Thornton: An Accurate Perspective”
  20. (1987). Henry Thornton: Seminal Monetary Theorist and Father of the Modern Central Bank”, Federal Reserve Bank of
  21. (2000). Highlights of the Bullionist Controversy”, Research Report #13,
  22. (1988). Historical Background of the Classical Monetary Theory and the 'Real Bills' Banking Tradition",
  23. (1954). History of Economic Analysis,
  24. (1989). Lender of Last Resort: The Concept in History” Federal Reserve Bank of
  25. (2003). Paper Credit and the Multi-Personae Mr. Henry Thornton”,
  26. Parliamentary Papers (1797), Report from the Committee of Secrecy On the Outstanding Demands of the Bank of England, in British Parliamentary Papers, The Bank of England and Commercial Credit, Monetary Policy, General I, Irish
  27. (2005). Rejoinder to Skaggs’s Treating Schizophrenia: a comment on Antoin Murphy’s diagnosis of Henry Thornton’s Theoretical Condition”,
  28. (1961). Ricardo and Thornton on the Transfer Mechanism”,
  29. (1986). The Bullionist Controversy Revisited"
  30. (2004). The Classical Economists Revisited, second edition,
  31. (1911). The Developments of the Theory of Money from Adam Smith to David Ricardo,"
  32. (1957). The Economic Writings of Francis Horner in the Edinburgh Review 1802-1806, Edited and with an Introduction by F.W.
  33. (1994). The Evolution of Adam Smith's Theory of Banking,"
  34. (1994). The Horner Papers: Selection from the Letters and Miscellaneous Writings of Francis Horner,
  35. (1955). The Irish Pound,
  36. (2003). The Lender-of-Last-Resort Concept in
  37. (1919). The Paper Pound of 1797-1821,
  38. (1929). The Period of Restriction, 1797-1821, and The Bullion Debate in England",
  39. (1936). The Rationale of Central Banking,
  40. (1982). The Real Bills Doctrine”, Federal Reserve
  41. (1992). The Real-Bills Doctrine in the Light of the Law of Reflux",
  42. (2003). Thomas Tooke, Henry Thornton and the Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy",
  43. (1991). Thomas Tooke: Pioneer of Monetary Theory,
  44. (2005). Treating Schizophrenia: a comment on Antoin Murphy’s diagnosis of Henry Thornton’s Theoretical Condition”,
  45. (2004). Two Views of the Lender of Last Resort: Thornton and Bagehot”, in Macroeconomics in retrospect: The selected essays of David Laidler,
  46. (2004). Walter (1753–1837).” In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.