Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Deciding to Decide: Gender, Leadership and Risk-Taking in Groups

By Seda Ertac and Mehmet Y. Gurdal


Being the leader in a group often involves making risky decisions that affect the payoffs of all members, and the decision to take this responsibility in a group is endogenous in many contexts. In this paper, we experimentally study: (1) the willingness of men and women to make risky decisions on behalf of a group, (2) the amount of risk men and women take for the group, in comparison to their individual decisions. We observe a striking difference between males and females, with a much lower fraction of women being willing to make the group decision than men. The amount of risk taken for the group is generally lower than in the case where subjects decide for themselves only, indicating a cautious shift. The women that would like to make the group decision and the women that do not are no different in terms of how much risk they take for themselves, nor for their group. For men, on the other hand, we find that the ones who would like to lead tend to take more risk on behalf of the group. We also present several results on the relationship of risk-taking and leadership decisions with personality traits.Conditional CAPM

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods,
  2. (2005). Are you risk averse over other people’s money.
  3. (2007). Comparing small-group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments.
  4. (1994). Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy.
  5. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?.
  6. (2004). Executives versus Teachers: Gender, Competition and Self-Selection.
  7. (2002). Five Factor Model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In
  8. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis,
  9. (2009). Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence from a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society,
  10. (2009). Gender differences in preferences.
  11. (2007). Gender, risk and stereotypes.
  12. (2009). Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers.
  13. (2008). Men, Women, and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence. In
  14. Occupational segregation by sex in Nordic countries: An empirical investigation.
  15. (2002). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52,
  16. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences,
  17. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study.
  18. (2010). Random incentive systems in a dynamic choice experiment.
  19. (1992). Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990.
  20. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.