Location of Repository

Anticipated regret and self-esteem in the Allais paradox



Our experiment aims at studying the impact of self-esteem on risk-prone choices in an Allais-type decision context using hypothetical money. We use an Internet protocol in order to reach a large heterogeneous student population sample. An anticipated regret explanation for the certainty effect implies that self-esteem is a crucial psychological variable in what concerns risky decision, but only when the choice is between a safe option and a risky option. Thus, in our experiment, we hypothesize that low self-esteem people will choose more frequently the safe option (rather than the risky-prone option) than high self-esteem people, whereas low self-esteem and high self-esteem individuals will show the same pattern of choices between two different risk-based options. Our data confirm our hypothesis. Regarding risky choices preferences, we also observe that females, non economists and older people significantly exhibit safer choice preferences than other participants. We find also that men and students in economics are more likely to conform to expected utility theory than females and other social science students respectively. We then discuss what these findings mean for economic regret theory, and suggest that a complete theory of decision-making under risk should introduce both situational and motivational explanations of individual behaviour.Allais paradox; Risk; Regret aversion; Self-esteem; Internet experiment; Gender differences

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (2003). A guide to Econometrics.
  2. (2007). A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0.
  3. (2001). Anticipated regret and self-esteem in the Allais paradox Mellers
  4. (2003). Are Political Economists Selfish and Indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment.
  5. (1995). Avoiding regret in decisions with feedback: A negotiation example. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
  6. (2007). Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret.
  7. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of Expected Feedback on Risky Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
  8. (2001). Design and evaluation in an economic experiment via the Internet.
  9. (1991). Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring State SelfEsteem.
  10. (1967). Die Strateiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperimentes. In: Sauermann,
  11. (1993). Does Studying Economics Inhibits Cooperation?
  12. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences.
  13. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A metaAnalysis.
  14. (1995). Individual decision making.
  15. (1953). Le Comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine.
  16. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice.
  17. (1979). Prospect Theory.
  18. (1992). Protecting the Self from the Negative Consequences of Risky Decisions.
  19. (2011). Regret aversion and the reluctance to exchange lottery tickets.
  20. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty.
  21. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative of rational choice under uncertainty.
  22. (1985). Regret, recrimination and rationality.
  23. (1983). Risk premiums for decision regret.
  24. (1993). Risk-Taking: A Motivational Basis for Sex Differences.
  25. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image.
  26. (2010). The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk – A view from the road not taken.
  27. (1944). The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.
  28. (1989). Three variants on the Allais Example.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.