Location of Repository

The Effects of Penalty Design on Market Performance: Experimental Evidence from an Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioned Permits

By Phillia Restiani and Regina Betz


This paper investigates the behavioural implications of penalty designs on market performance using an experimental method. Three penalty types and two penalty levels are enforced in a laboratory permit market with auctioning, including the Australian Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme proposed design of tying the penalty rate to the auction price. Compliance strategies are limited to undertaking irreversible abatement investment decisions or buying permits. We aim to assess how penalty design under the presence of subjects‟ risk preferences might affect compliance incentives, permit price discovery, and efficiency. In contrast to theory, we find that penalty levels serve as a focal point that indicates compliance costs and affects compliance strategies. The make-good provision penalty provides stronger compliance incentives than the other penalty types. However, the theory holds with regard to permit price discovery, as we find no evidence of the effect of penalty design on auction price. Interestingly, risk preference does not directly affect compliance decision, but it does influence price discovery, which evidently is a significant factor in compliance decisions as well as efficiency. Most importantly, a trade-off between investment incentives and efficiency is observed.emissions trading, penalty design, experiment, auction, irreversible investment, abatement, compliance, Environmental Economics and Policy, Resource /Energy Economics and Policy,

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (2007). A laboratory investigation of compliance behavior under tradable emissions rights: Implications for targeted enforcement.
  2. (2010). A symmetric safety valve.
  3. (2010). A Theoretical Model of Optimal Compliance Decisions under Different Penalty Designs in Emissions Trading Markets. The Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities (CERF)
  4. (2009). Alternative Approaches to Cost Containment in a Capand-Trade System. SSRN eLibrary.
  5. (2008). Assessing the effects of CO2 price caps on electricity investments--A real options analysis.
  6. (2007). Auction Design for Selling CO2 Emission Allowances under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Final Report.
  7. (2007). Auctions and information acquisition: sealed bid or dynamic formats?
  8. (2003). Auctions with private uncertainty and resale opportunities.
  9. (1997). Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution.
  10. (2003). Competitive Bidding in Auctions with Private and Common Values.
  11. (1994). Designing organizations for trading pollution rights.
  12. (2006). Emissions variability in tradable permit markets with imperfect enforcement and banking.
  13. (1999). Endogenous Monitoring and Enforcement of a Transferable Emissions Permit System.
  14. (2007). Experimental test of the effect of imposing a penalty on buyers in a specific market structure.
  15. (1990). Markets for pollution control when firms are noncompliant.
  16. (1981). On Nonbinding Price Controls in a Competitive Market.
  17. (2004). On the quality of compliance mechanisms in the Kyoto Protocol.
  18. (2003). RE: Restoration Rates to Enforce Early Action. Type to VROM.
  19. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.
  20. (2009). The design, testing and implementation of Virginia's NOx allowance auction.
  21. (2000). The Influence of Banking and Borrowing under Different Penalty Regimes in Tradable Green Certificate Markets - Results from an
  22. (2002). The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A Guide for the Organization of Experiments
  23. (2004). The safety valve and climate policy.
  24. (2002). What Really Matters in Auction Design.
  25. (1999). z-Tree - Zurich toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments. Institute for Experimental Research in Economics,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.