Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Affect the Real Interest Parity Condition?

By Christian Dreger


The real interest partity (RIP) condition combines two cornerstones in international finance, uncovered interest parity (UIP) and ex ante purchasing power parity (PPP). The extent of deviation from RIP is therefore an indicator of the lack of product and financial market integration. This paper investigates whether the nominal exchange rate regime has an impact on RIP. The analysis is based on 15 annual real interest rates and covers a long time span, 1870-2006. Four subperiods are distinguished and linked to fixed and flexible exchange rate regimes: the Gold Standard, the interwar float, the Bretton Woods system and the current managed float. Panel integration techniques are used to increase the power of the tests. Cross section correlation is embedded via common factor structures. The results suggest that RIP holds as a long run condition irrespectively of the exchange rate regimes. Adjustment towards RIP is affected by the institutional framework and the historical episode. Half lives of shocks tend to be lower under fixed exchange rates and in the first part of the sample, probably due to higher price flexibility before WWII. Although barriers to foreign trade and capital controls were substantially removed after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, they did not lead to lower half lives during the managed float.Real interest parity, nominal exchange rate regime, panel unit roots, common factors

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1984):Are real interest rates equal across countries?An empirical investigation of international parity conditions,
  2. (2004). A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration,
  3. (1993). A re-assessment of the relationship between real exchange rates and real interest rates: 1974-1990,
  4. (1998). A re-examination of real interest rate parity,
  5. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence,
  6. (2003). An essay on the revived Bretton Woods system,
  7. (2003). Are real interest rates cointegrated? Further evidence based on paneleconometric methods,
  8. (1996). Between the Dollar-Sterling points: Exchange rates, parity and market behaviour,
  9. (2005). Comparison of panel unit root tests under cross sectional dependence,
  10. (2005). Confidence intervals for half-life deviations from purchasing power parity,
  11. (2002). Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models,
  12. (2007). Do real interest rates converge? Evidence from the European Union,
  13. (2002). Does long-run real interest parity hold among EU countries? Some new panel data evidence,
  14. (2003). Does the real interest rate parity hypothesis hold? Evidence for developed and emerging markets,
  15. (2007). Economics of monetary union,
  16. (2002). Fin de si├Ęcle real interest parity,
  17. (2003). Global transmission of interest rates: Monetary independence and currency regime,
  18. (2003). Has international financial integration increased?,
  19. (1994). History of the international monetary system: Implications for research in international macroeconomics and finance,
  20. (1995). International financial integration: A study of interest differentials between the major industrial countries,
  21. (1995). Is there a world real interest rate?,
  22. (1995). Likelihood based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models,
  23. (2006). New evidence of the real interest parity for OECD countries using panel unit root tests with breaks,
  24. (1986). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the behaviour of real exchange rates: Evidence and implications,
  25. (1991). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the real exchange rate,
  26. (2003). Nonlinear aspects of capital market integration and real interest equalization,
  27. (2004). Panel unit root tests in the presence of cross-sectional dependencies: Comparison and implications for modelling, Research Memorandum 040,
  28. (1991). Pitfalls and opportunities. What macroeconomists should know about unit roots,
  29. (1994). Real interest rate equalisation and the integration of international financial markets,
  30. (2000). Real interest rate parity under regime shifts and implications for monetary policy,
  31. (2004). Some cautious on the use of panel methods for integrated series in macroeconomic data,
  32. (1996). Some evidence on mean reversion in ex ante real interest rates.,
  33. (2005). Testing for PPP: Should we use Panel Methods?,
  34. (1999). Testing for real interest rate convergence in European Financial Systems, Efficiency and Stimulation of Sustainable Growth Working Paper FINESS.D.1.1c countries,
  35. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels;
  36. (1990). The Gold Standard, deflation and financial crisis in the Great Depression: An international comparison, NBER Working Paper 3488.
  37. (1987). The international linkage of real interest rates:
  38. (2004). The persistence in international real interest rates,
  39. (1992). The persistence of real interest differentials. A Kalman filtering approach,
  40. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties,
  41. (1988). Was it real? The Exchange Rate-Interest Differential Relation over the Modern Floating Period,
  42. (1995). Who drives real interest around the Pacific Rim: The USA or Japan?,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.