Location of Repository

Individual preferences and the distribution of wealth

By Luc Arrondel and André Masson


For a sub-sample of French households of an Insee wealth survey, we obtain new and relative measures of 5 individual preference parameters : the risk "attitude" (aversion, prudence...), the rate of time depreciation over the life-cycle, the degree of short-term impatience, and the degrees of family and non family altruism. Short-term impatience and non family altruism are found no to affect wealth but, contrarily to recent results of behavioural analysis, the three other parameters have significant effects on wealth (financial, gross or net), which are consistent with theoretical predictions : wealth accumulation increases with the degree of prudence (precautionary saving), falls with time preference (life-cycle saving) and rises with the degree of family altruism (wealth intended for bequests). The way preferences are measured allows to get rid of potential causality problems and the joint explanatory power of the three parameters appears sizeable, although less important than the one of classic explanatory variables (age, income, social class and inheritance).risk aversion ; time preference ; altruism ; wealth ; inequalities

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (1997). 1Sample Aged 50-65 Weak Medium Strong Weak Medium Strong Weak Medium Strong
  2. (1997). 1Variables Coefficient T-statistic Coefficient T-statistic Coefficient T-statistic Risk Aversion (Ref: CRRA>3.76) No Reply
  3. 1Variables Statistic Critical Level Statistic Critical Level Statistic Critical Level Exogeneity Tests in Augmented Regressions (t-statistic)
  4. (2001). 24 Since the variable to be instrumented is ordinal (the planning horizon in four bands) we should use an ordered Probit for the instrumental regression. Angrist and Krueger
  5. (1978). A
  6. (2001). A Theory of the Consumption Function, With and Without Liquidity Constraints",
  7. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing, Yrjö Johnson Lectures,
  8. (1989). Bequests and Wealth Accumulation: Are there Some Pieces of the Puzzle Missing?",
  9. (2003). c) Plans (from 0 to 30 years) A number of American studies (Lusardi,
  10. (2001). Choice, Chance and Wealth Dispersion at Retirement",
  11. (1997). Coefficients significant at the 1, 5 and 10 per cent significance level, respectively.
  12. (1997). Coefficients significant at the 1, 5 and 10 per cent significance level, respectively. -26-0,464 0,447 0,393 Appendix Table A1.
  13. (1997). Coefficients significant at the 1, 5 and 10 per cent significance level, respectively. h a l s h s
  14. (1995). Consumption over the Life Cycle and over the Business Cycle",
  15. (1997). Hyperbolic Discount Functions, and Time Preference Heterogeneity", mimeo, TMR "Saving, Pensions and Portfolio Choice", Tilburg. h a l s h s
  16. (1989). Hypothèse du cycle de vie et accumulation du patrimoine :
  17. (2001). Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments",
  18. (1999). Modèles structurels et variables explicatives endogènes'', Méthodologie statistique,
  19. (1997). On the Endogenous Determination of Time Preference",
  20. (2001). On the Interaction of Risk and Time Preferences - An Experimental Study"
  21. (2003). only show the F-statistic of the instruments, which is very significant (<0.0001). However, orthogonality (via the over-identification test) is only accepted at the 8% level. h a l s h s
  22. (2003). Other &quot;behavioural&quot; analyses of saving (Lusardi,
  23. (2003). Planning and Savings for Retirement&quot;, Working Paper,
  24. (1995). Precautionary Saving and Social Insurance&quot;
  25. (1997). Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Survey&quot;,
  26. (2004). Préférences face au risque et à l'avenir : types d'épargnants&quot;, forthcoming in Revue Economique.
  27. (1995). Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak&quot;,
  28. (2004). Saving and the Effectiveness of Financial Education&quot;, forthcoming in Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance,
  29. (1997). Significant correlations at the 5% level are shown in bold. h a l s h s
  30. (2003). Stockholding in France&quot;, in Stockholding
  31. (2002). Subjective Measures of Risk Aversion and Portfolio Choice'', CENter Discussion paper No.2002-11,
  32. (1997). Table 5a. Ranking of Partial R 2 Coefficients in Wealth Regressions Financial Wealth Gross Wealth Net Wealth Variables h a l s h s
  33. (1997). Table 5b. Decomposition of Wealth inequality (in %): Theil Index Variables Total Population &quot;Experimental&quot; Sample 10 207 h a l s h s
  34. (1997). Table E3. Instrumentation of scales including scores OLS IV 959 -24-959 Log Gross Wealth Log Net Wealth 1030 1031 Table E2. The Instrumentation of Scales Log Financial Wealth Log Gross Wealth Log Net Wealth 1029 1031 Source: INSEE Patrimoine
  35. Total Population &quot;Experimental&quot; Sample &quot;Experimental&quot; Sample -27-0,506 0,543 0,557 Appendix Table A2. Gross Wealth Equations (Log.) 10162 1131 1131 h a l s h s
  36. (1992). Understanding Consumption,
  37. (2003). Wealth Accumulation and the Propensity to Plan&quot;,
  38. Wealth Regressions (Lotterys vs.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.