Article thumbnail

A Framework for Exchange Rate Policy in Korea

By Michael Dooley, Rudi Dornbusch and Yung Chul Park

Abstract

The monetary policy and exchange rate regime that served Korea well for many years ended in crisis in 1997. The regime that collapsed was characterized by a tightly managed nominal exchange rate and domestic financial markets that were controlled by the government and largely closed to international transactions. The practical question for authorities over the next few years is what monetary and exchange rate regime will best promote the objectives of maintaining economic and financial stability as financial markets are liberalized. Our basic proposal is that the powerful policy tool, interest rate policy, be used to attain a "flexible" inflation target. Flexibility in this context means that the authorities also care about short-run fluctuations in domestic output and employment. The less powerful policy tool, sterilized intervention in the foreign exchange market, would be used to limit day to day changes in exchange rates. We argue that the government should continue to be an important participant in the foreign exchange market but not attempt to establish a level for the exchange rate. Our proposal will involve intervention that is triggered by exchange rate volatility but constrained by an announced target for the government's overall net foreign asset position. The objective of this regime is to allow the government to participate in the foreign exchange market in a way that contributes to economic stability and promotes the development of the private sector's participation in foreign exchange and financial markets.monetary policy, exchange rate regime, Korea, government

OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). Can Flexible Exchange Rates still
  2. (1994). Currency Boards for Developing Countries: A Handbook.
  3. (1999). Exchange Rate and Financial Fragility.”
  4. (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?” A paper presented at the Meeting of the American Economic Association,
  5. (1998). Lessons from the European Monetary Union For Latin America,” At http://www.mit.edu/~rudi
  6. (2000). Monetary Policy Strategies for Latin America,"
  7. (2000). On the Desirability of a Regional Basket Currency Arrangement,” NBER Working Paper No.800235 Roubini, N.
  8. (2001). Post-crisis Exchange Rate Policy in Five Asian Countries: Filling in the Hollow Middle?” A paper prepared for a seminar on Exchange Rate Regimes: Hard Peg on Free Floating.”
  9. (1993). Russian Currency and Finance: A Currency Board Approach to Reform.
  10. (2000). Testimony on Dollarization,” Subcommittee on Domestic and Monetary Policy, Committee on Banking and Financial Services.
  11. (2000). The Case for Hard Pegs in the Brave New World of Global Finance.”
  12. (1998). The Morning After: The Mexican Peso
  13. (2000). The Pass-through from Depreciation to Inflation: A Panel Study,”