Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Macroeconomic effects of carbon dioxide emission reduction: a computable general equilibrium analysis for Malaysia

By Abul Quasem Al-Amin, Jaafar Abdul Hamid and Siwar Chamhuri


This study analyzes the macroeconomic effects of limiting carbon emissions using computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in the Malaysian economy. Doing so, we developed an environmental computable general equilibrium model and investigate carbon tax policy responses in the economy applying exogenously different degrees of carbon tax into the model. Three simulations were carried out using a Malaysian Social Accounting Matrix. The carbon tax policy illustrates that a 1.21% reduction of carbon emission reduces the nominal GDP by 0.82% and exports by 2.08%; a 2.34% reduction of carbon emission reduces the nominal GDP by 1.90% and exports by 3.97%and a 3.40% reduction of carbon emission reduces the nominal GDP by 3.17% and exports by 5.71%. Imposition of successively higher carbon tax results in increased government revenue from baseline by 26.67%, 53.07% and 79.28% respectively. However, fixed capital investment increased in scenario 1a (1st) by 0.43% but decreased in scenarios 1b (2nd) and 1c (3rd) by 0.26% and 1.79% respectively from the baseline. According to our findings policy-makes should consider initial (1st) carbon tax policy. This policy results in achieving reasonably good environmental impacts without losing the investment, fixed capital investment, investment share of nominal GDP and government revenue.Emission; Environmental General Equilibrium; Malaysian Economy

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). Accounting for quality: Issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing economies.
  2. (2001). CO2 Accounts for Open Economies: Producer or Consumer Responsibility? Energy Policy.
  3. (2003). Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations.
  4. (1999). Economic Report, Various Issues.
  5. (2003). Eighth Malaysia Plan. Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department,
  6. (1980). Energy balance of trade in New Zealand. Energy Systems and Policy.
  7. (1985). Energy-intensive materials and the developing countries.
  8. (1988). Environmental Economics and Management: Pollution and Natural Resources.
  9. (2001). Environmental Quality Report 2000.Ministry of Science technology and the environment.
  10. (2005). FDI and the Capital Intensity of ‘Dirty’ Sectors: A Missing Piece of the Pollution haven Puzzle. Review of Development Economics.
  11. (1999). From Stylized to applied models: Building multisector CGE models for policy analysis.
  12. (1993). General Equilibrium Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies: Some Preliminary Results Based on Swedish Data.
  13. (1992). Growth and Welfare Losses from Carbon Emissions Restrictions: A General Equilibrium Analysis for Egypt. Working Paper,
  14. (2005). Input-Output Table of Malaysia-2000,
  15. International trade and environmental quality: how important the linkages?
  16. (1990). Intertemporal General Equilibrium Modeling of U.S. Environmental Regulation.
  17. (2001). Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review.
  18. (1993). Modeling Air Pollution Abatement in a Market Based Incentive Framework for the Los Angeles Basin (unpublished paper).
  19. (2001). NAFTA and Industrial Pollution: Some General Equilibrium Results.
  20. (2006). Ninth Malaysia Plan,
  21. (1994). North-South Trade and the Environment.
  22. (1990). Pollution, Market Failure, and Optimal Policy in an Economy-wide Framework.
  23. (1998). Sources of changes in emissions from energy: a structural decomposition analysis.
  24. (1994). Structural Changes and Energy Consumption in the Japanese Economy 1975-85: An Input-Output Analysis.
  25. (1975). The energy cost of goods and services. Energy Policy.
  26. (1997). The Trade and Environment Nexus in Mexican Agriculture. A General Equilibrium Analysis. Agricultural Economics.
  27. (2004). Trade and Environment: Unmasking the pollution Haven Effect. NBER working paper no.
  28. (2005). Trade and the Environment in General Equilibrium: Evidence from Developing Economies.
  29. (1994). Trade Liberalization and the Environment in the Pacific Basin: Coordinated Approaches to Mexican Trade and Environmental Policy.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.