Location of Repository

Efficiency frontier and matching process on the labor market: Evidence from Tunisia

By Imed Drine and Anis Bou Abid

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the determinants of the inefficient functioning of the Tunisian labour market. The study takes advantage of the recent development in the stochastic frontier techniques and estimates, the matching function for Tunisia using disaggregated data. We include control variables as determinants of matching efficiency and regional disparities. We confirm that the persistently high rate of unemployment is the result of not only excess labour supply but is also related to a shortfall between supply and demand (sector, location, qualification).labour market, structural unemployment, technical efficiency, matching across regions, developing country.

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. 2005a, “Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models”,
  2. 2005b, ”Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model”.
  3. (1996). Active labour market policies, job matching and the Czech miracle”,
  4. (2004). Aggregate matching efficiency: a stochastic production frontier approach”.,
  5. (2002). An Empirical Matching Function with Regime Switching: The Japanese Case”, Discussion
  6. (1996). Cross-section estimation of the matching function: evidence from England and Wales”,
  7. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data.,
  8. (2004). Efficiency Measurement Using a Latent Class Stochastic Frontier Model »,
  9. (2000). Empirical matching functions: Estimation and interpretation using state-level data”,
  10. (2005). Estimating a matching function and regional matching efficiencies”,
  11. (2004). Estimation of Technical Inefficiencies with Heterogeneous Technologies ».,
  12. (1991). Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in Panel Data Models with Firm- and Time-Specific Effects”.
  13. (2002). Estimations of occupational and regional matching efficiencies using stochastic production frontier models”,
  14. (2001). Externalities in the matching of workers and firms in
  15. (1995). How does Employment Protection Legislation Affect Unemployment in Tunisia? A Search Equilibrium Approach »., IMF working paper wp/05/92
  16. (1995). Job matching and job competition: Are lower educated workers at the back of queues?”
  17. (1999). Job searchers, job matches and the elasticity of matching”,
  18. (2001). Looking into the black box: a survey of the matching function”,
  19. (1998). Marketplaces and matching”,
  20. (1996). Matching across space: Evidence on mobility in the Czech Republic”,
  21. (2006). Matching heterogeneous job seekers and vacancies: Empirical studies using Finnish data”,
  22. (2006). Regional Matching Frictions and Aggregate Unemployment”,
  23. (2008). Spatial Panel Econometrics,”
  24. (1987). Structural Unemployment.
  25. (1989). The Beveridge curve”,
  26. (1999). The hiring function reconsidered: on closing the circle.”
  27. (2003). Unemployment equilibrium and on-the-job search”,
  28. (1993). Unemployment, labour markets and structural change in
  29. (1988). Unemployment, vacancies, and the long-term unemployed”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.