Article thumbnail

Stated Preference Evaluation of Government Budgets

By Geoffrey N. Kerr, Ross Cullen and Kenneth F.D. Hughey

Abstract

Stated preference approaches are widely used in non-market valuation. However, their potential uses extend far beyond valuation. In particular they can be used to assess efficiency of resource allocations and to design optimal resource allocations. Changes to the government budget were evaluated using a choice experiment. Results indicate potential efficiency gains from reallocation of the budget to items with higher marginal utility. In particular, New Zealand residents want more spending on health, education and the environment, with health spending consistently having the highest marginal benefits. People want less government money spent on income support. The choice experiment was able to identify the impacts of demographic factors. Young people rated spending on the environment and education more highly than other respondents.Choice experiment, public preferences, government budget, Community/Rural/Urban Development, Consumer/Household Economics, Environmental Economics and Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Health Economics and Policy, Political Economy, Research Methods/ Statistical Methods,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/98520

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1966). A catalogue and computer programme for the design and analysis of symmetric and asymmetric fractional factorial experiments.
  2. (1987). Budget-games and the private and social demand for mixed public goods.
  3. (1983). Demands for public spending: An attitudinal approach.
  4. (1993). Economics 2 nd edition.
  5. (2003). Environmental budget allocation: public preferences.
  6. (2001). Estimation of the value and cost of government and market supplied goods.
  7. (1995). Experiments on rating the utility of consumer goods: evidence supporting microeconomic theory.
  8. (2001). If I had 10 billion to spend: An empirical study of Swedes’ preferences over budget allocation. In Israelsson, T. Infrastructure investments and environmental preservation: an economic foundation for public decisions.
  9. (2003). Measuring principals’ values for environmental budget management: an exploratory study.
  10. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities.
  11. (2002). Perceptions of the state of the environment: the 2002 survey of public attitudes, preferences and perceptions of the New Zealand environment.
  12. (2002). Public Goods and Private Wants: A psychological approach to government spending.
  13. (2000). Public marginal willingness to trade off among water quality programs: Estimates of statewide and watershed-specific budget values.
  14. (1995). Rating the value of government-funded services: Comparison of methods.
  15. (1998). Rating the values of government and market supplied goods.
  16. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and application.
  17. (2001). The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation.
  18. (2003). The effect of providing misleading cost information on the perceived value of government services.
  19. (1998). The median voter according to GARP.
  20. (1989). The stability of stated preferences for public goods: Evidence from recent budget games.
  21. (1995). The value of services supplied by the New Zealand government.