Location of Repository

Nutrition and health claims – call for and justification of governmental intervention from the consumers’ perspective

By Monika Hartmann, Anne Katrin Lensch, Johannes Simons and Sylvia Thrams


In December 2006 the Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 on the use of nutrition and health claims (NHCs) on foods was enacted in order to prevent consumer deception and to harmonise law within the EU. Against this background, this paper analyses the potential costs and benefits linked with NHCs and the necessity for governmental intervention to regulate NHCs within a theoretical and empirical framework. The theoretical investigation shows that NHCs can induce direct economic effects as well as spillover effects in the market of information. Whether those effects are beneficial or adverse depends on the truthfulness of the NHCs, and consumers’ perception and processing of such claims. As self regulatory forces of the market might not be sufficient to prevent market failure due to fraudulent claims, governmental intervention seems necessary. An analysis of the EU Regulation on NHCs reveals that this law focuses on preventing the authorisation of false or misleading claims. It is less concerned with not authorising a true and correctly understood claim. The results of the empirical analysis which is based on a standardized consumer survey reveal that the stated impact of NHCs on product perception considerably differs among consumers. While e.g. some consumers feel misled by NHCs on products with a negative nutrient profile such as candies, others point out that such claims have no impact on their product perception or even help them to make better choices. The results also indicate that the great majority of consumers is opposed to a ban of NHCs on products with a negative nutrient profile such as candies and salt.nutrition and health claims, consumer deception, information economics, market transparency, consumer protection policy, Consumer/Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/97545

Suggested articles



  1. (1974). Advertising as Information. In:
  2. (1985). An Ethical Analysis of Deception in Advertising. In:
  3. (2001). An Introduction to the Economics of Information.
  4. (2006). Can Health Claims for Foods Help Consumers Choose Better Diets? In:
  5. (1997). Consumer perceptions of health claims in advertisements and on food labels.
  6. (1988). Consumer Scepticism and Advertising Regulation: What Do the Polls Show? In:
  7. (1990). Consumer Scepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information. In:
  8. (2005). Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods.
  9. (1999). Consumer Use of Information: Implications for Food Policy.
  10. (2004). Datenreport 2004. Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
  11. (1991). Economics and Consumer Protection. In:
  12. (1997). Fear of Persuasion: A New Perspective on Advertising and Regulation.
  13. (2006). forthcoming): The Defensive Consumer: Advertising Deception, Defensive Processing, and Distrust. In:
  14. (2005). Functional Foods: Opportunities and Challenges.
  15. (1995). Health Claims and Consumer Skepticism: The Influencing Effects of Information Type, Sponsor Reputation, and Information Channel. Thesis.
  16. (1999). Health Claims in Food Advertising and Labeling. Dissemination Nutrition Information to Consumers.
  17. (2002). Health Claims on Food Packaging. Consumer-related Qualitative Research.
  18. (2003). How Do Front and Back Package Labels Influence Beliefs about Health Claims? In:
  19. (1999). Impact of Health Claims on Consumer Search and Product Evaluation Outcomes: Results from FDA Experimental Data. In:
  20. (2000). Information Regulation (Including Regulation of Advertising).
  21. (2000). Informationsökonomische Markenpolitik: zur Bedeutung der Informationsökonomik für die Markenpolitik von Herstellern. Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften,
  22. (2002). Kennzeichnungspflicht für genetisch veränderte Lebensmittel: Eine ökonomische Analyse. Institut für Wirtschaftspolitik, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg.
  23. (1997). Messages on Food. Consumers’ use and understanding of health claims on food packs.
  24. (2003). National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: How much, and who’s paying? In: Health Affairs W3:
  25. (2006). No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the
  26. (2004). Nutrition labels and health claims: the global regulatory environment.
  27. (2004). Obesity: Economic Dimensions of a “Super Size” Problem. Choices,
  28. (1991). Public Policy Issues in Health Claims for Foods. In:
  29. (2004). Regulation of Information and Advertising.
  30. (2007). Review and analysis of current literature on consumer understanding of nutrition and health claims made on foods.
  31. (1991). Staff Report Federal Trade Commission,
  32. STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND) (2003): A Qualitative Consumer Study related to Nutrition Content Claims on Food Labels. Prepared by NFO Donovan Research, Marketing and Communications Research Consultants.
  33. (1981). The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information.
  34. (2007). The impact of Warnings, Disclaimers, and Product Experience on Consumers’ Perception of Dietary Supplements. In:
  35. (1981). The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality. In:
  36. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”. Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. In:
  37. (2000). The Nutrition Facts Panel and Package Claims: The Role of Nutrient Values, Multiple Claims and Congruent Information on Attitudes. Disease-Related Risks and Consumer Trust. In:
  38. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People cope with Persuasion Attempts. In:
  39. (1990). The Regulation of Science-Based Claims in Advertising. In:
  40. (2003). The Use of Nutrient Content, Health, and Structure/Function Claims in Food Advertisements. In:
  41. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality.
  42. (2004). What can we learn from food advertising policy over the last 25 years? In:
  43. (1999). What’s wrong with “deceptive” advertising? In:
  44. (1991). Who Reads the Label? In:
  45. (1988). Zur ökonomischen Theorie des Betrügens und des Fälschens. In:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.