Article thumbnail

Trust and attitude in consumer food choices under risk

By Michele Graffeo, Lucia Savadori, Luigi Lombardi, Katya Tentori, Nicolao Bonini and Rino Rumiati

Abstract

In this paper, attitude and trust are studied in the context of a food scare (dioxin) with the aim of identifying the components of attitude and trust that significantly affect how purchases are determined. A revised version of the model by MAYER et al. (1995) was tested for two types of food: salmon and chicken. The final model for salmon shows that trust is significantly determined by perceived competence, perceived shared values, truthfulness of information and the experiential attitude (the feeling that consuming salmon is positive), but trust has no impact on behavioural intentions. Consumer preferences seem to be determined by a positive experiential attitude and the perception that breeders, sellers and institutions have values similar to those of the consumer. The model for chicken gave very similar results.trust, trust antecedents, attitude, food scare, purchase intention, Consumer/Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Risk and Uncertainty,

OAI identifier:
Downloaded from http://purl.umn.edu/97499

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A note on modelling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease. In:
  2. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.
  3. (1998). Attitude dissimulation and persuasion.
  4. (2000). Attitudes and the attitudebehavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes.
  5. (1997). Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production – the influence of consumer benefit.
  6. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
  7. (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues.
  8. (1998). Explaining attitudes towards the euro: Design of a cross-national study.
  9. (1989). Framework of rationality in risk management: Towards the testing of naïve sociology.
  10. (1999). Geographical dimensions and correlates of trust.
  11. (2004). Individual differences in attitude structure: Variance in the chronic reliance on affective and cognitive information.
  12. (1982). Lay foibles and expert fables in judgements about risk.
  13. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. In:
  14. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfilment. In:
  15. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge.
  16. (1993). PRELIS2 user's reference guide.
  17. (1996). Public perception of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study.
  18. (1994). Public perception of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: An empirical study.
  19. (1992). Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public.
  20. (2003). Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks.
  21. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance.
  22. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology.
  23. (1993). The psychology of attitudes.
  24. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.
  25. (1999). Trust and distrust in organization: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions.
  26. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity.
  27. (1997). Understanding food choice in adult men: Influence of nutrition knowledge, food beliefs and dietary restraint.
  28. (1996). What determines trust in information about foodrelated risk? Underlying psychological constructs.