Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Altruism, equity and reciprocity in a gift-exchange experiment: An encompassing approach

By Gary Charness and Ernan Haruvy

Abstract

Considerable experimental evidence suggests that non-pecuniary motives must be addressed when modeling behavior in economic contexts. Recent models of non-pecuniary motives can be classified as either altruism- based, equity-based, or reciprocity-based. We estimate and compare leading approaches in these categories, using experimental data. We then offer a flexible approach that nests the above three approaches, thereby allowing for nested hypothesis testing and for determining the relative strength of each of the competing theories. In addition, the encompassing approach provides a functional form for utility in different settings without the restrictive nature of the approaches nested within it. Using this flexible form for nested tests, we find that intentional reciprocity, distributive concerns, and altruistic considerations all play a significant role in players' decisions.Altruism, experiment, equity, encompassing, fairness, inequality aversion, reciprocity, Leex

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining," American Economic Review,
  2. (1981). Some Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality,
  3. (1997). The Moonlighting Game: An Experimental Study on Reciprocity and Retribution,"
  4. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.