Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A note on the link between public expenditures and distortionary taxation

By Thomas Gaube


This note deals with the optimal provision of a public good in the context of the Ramsey tax model. It is shown that the second-best level of public good provision is inefficiently low relative to a situation where additional expenditures can be financed by lump-sum taxation.distortionary taxation

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1947). A Study in Public Finance,
  2. (1998). An Investigation Into Alternative Representations of the
  3. (1992). Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods”
  4. (2005). Financing Public Goods With Income Taxation: Provision Rules vs.
  5. (1998). Is Pigou Wrong? Can Distortionary Taxation Cause Public Spending to Exceed the Efficient Level?”, Discussion Paper,
  6. (1990). On Measures of Excess Burden And Their Application”
  7. (1991). Optimal Public Good Provision With Limited Lump-Sum Taxation”
  8. (1994). Optimal Taxation And Government Finance” in Modern Public Finance
  9. (1995). Public Economics,
  10. (1998). Redistribution And the Marginal Cost of Public Funds”
  11. (2000). Rules and Levels in the Provision of Public Goods:
  12. (2001). The Second-Best Level of a Public Good: An Approach Based on
  13. (2000). When Do Distortionary Taxes Reduce the Optimal Supply of Public Goods?”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.