Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Does the impact of employment protection legislation on FDI differ by skill-intensity of sectors? An empirical investigation

By Markus Leibrecht and Christian Bellak


In line with previous literature this paper finds that employment protection legislation, especially regulations towards regular employment, has a negative impact on the volume of inward Foreign Direct Investment. Yet, we also find that the deterrent effect of inflexible labor markets is predominantly given for industries with relatively high shares of low skilled workers employed. This result is consistent with the view that high exit costs due to strict employment protection legislation matters particularly for mobile industries like the textile, food and wood industries which continuously seek for low labor cost locations.Foreign Direct Investment; Labour Market; OECD; Panel Econometrics

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). A sectoral taxonomy of educational intensity,
  2. (2004). Asian Development Outlook
  3. (2009). Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment – A Tale Of Nine Theoretical Models,
  4. (2005). Determinants of Location Choices by Multinational Firms: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge, Applied Economics Quarterly. Supplement to issue 56:
  5. (2002). Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise,
  6. (2005). Do Foreign Investors Care about Labor Market Regulations? Review of World Economics.
  7. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data.
  8. (2004). Empirical asymmetries in foreign direct investment and taxation,
  9. (2004). Employment Outlook.
  10. (2001). Employment protection,
  11. (2005). Fancy a Stay at the 'Hotel California'? The Role of Easy Entry and Exit for FDI,
  12. (2008). FDI location and size: Does employment protection legislation matter? Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  13. (2007). FDI versus exports: evidence from German banks,
  14. (2004). Foreign direct investment and tax competition.
  15. (2009). Globalization and the Welfare State: A Review of Hans-Werner Sinn‟s Can Germany Be Saved?
  16. (2001). Görg, Holger and Catia Montagna (2009). Should I stay or should I go? Foreign direct Investment, employment protection and domestic anchorage,
  17. (2009). Government strategies to attract R&D-intensive FDI,
  18. (2009). How important is employment protection legislation for Foreign Direct Investment flows in Central and Eastern European countries?
  19. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system
  20. (2008). Hunting High and Low for Vertical FDI,
  21. (2006). Infrastructure and FDI into Mexico: a panel data approach,
  22. (2009). Infrastructure endowment and corporate income taxes as determinants of foreign direct investment in Central- and Eastern European Countries, World Economy.
  23. (2003). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 2nd edition. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  24. Maylis and Thierry Mayer (2007a). Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment, World Economy.
  25. (2009). Microeconometrics Using Stata.
  26. (2005). Oh No! I Got the Wrong Sign! What Should I Do?
  27. Organization (2008). World of Work.
  28. (1998). Taxes and the location of production: evidence from a panel of US multinationals,
  29. (2004). The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies,
  30. The Regulation of Entry,
  31. (2000). The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence,
  32. (2006). Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis, Political Analysis.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.