Location of Repository

Employment Consequences of Employment Protection Legislation

By Per Skedinger


This article surveys the literature and adds to the evidence on the impact of employment protection legislation on employment. While stringent employment protection contributes to less turnover and job reallocation, the effects on aggregate employment and unemployment over the business cycle are more uncertain. Exploitation of partial reforms and the use of micro data in recent research appear not to have affected results regarding employment and unemployment in any systematic way. Labour market prospects of young people and other marginal groups seem to worsen as a consequence of increased stringency of the legislation. It is debatable whether marginal groups have gained much from the widespread policy strategy to liberalize regulations of temporary employment and leave regulations of regular employment intact. My own analysis suggests that increased stringency of regulations for regular work is associated with a higher incidence of involuntary temporary employment, particularly among the young.Job security; Employment effects; Employment protection reforms

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles



  1. (1992). A note on firing costs and severance benefits in equilibrium unemployment,
  2. (2006). Anställningsskydd, småföretag och tillväxt,
  3. (2011). Are judges sensitive to economic conditions? Evidence from UK employment tribunals, forthcoming in Industrial and Labor Relations Review.
  4. (2006). Assessing job flows across countries: The role of industry, firm size and regulations, Discussion Paper 2450,
  5. (1996). Assessing the role of labour market policies and institutional settings on unemployment: A cross-country study,
  6. (1988). Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic performance,
  7. (2007). Can wrongful discharge law enhance employment?,
  8. (2004). Changes in job security and their causes: An empirical analysis for France, 19822002,
  9. (2000). Common law exceptions to employment at will and US labor markets,
  10. (2006). Den svenska arbetsrätten i internationell belysning,
  11. (2007). Dismissal protection and worker flows in small establishments,
  12. (2009). Dismissals for cause: The difference that just eight paragraphs can make,
  13. (2009). Do wrongful discharge laws impair firm performance?,
  14. (2008). Does employment protection help immigrants? Evidence from European labour markets, Discussion Paper 3414,
  15. (2007). Does employment protection reduce productivity? Evidence from U.S. states,
  16. (2005). Does employment protection reduce the demand for unskilled labour?,
  17. (2004). Does the recent success of some OECD countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labor market reforms?,
  18. (2008). Effects of dismissal protection legislation on individual employment stability in Germany, paper presented at the EALE conference in
  19. (2008). Effects of employment protection on worker and job flows: Evidence from the 1990 Italian reform,
  20. (2002). Employment consequences of restrictive permanent contracts: Evidence from Spanish labor market reforms, Discussion Paper 657,
  21. (2006). Employment Outlook,
  22. (1995). Employment policies and displacement in the youth labour market,
  23. (2010). Employment protection legislation in Sweden, in Att skapa arbeten – löner, anställningsskydd och konkurrens, SOU 2010:93, Ministry of Finance,
  24. (2008). Employment protection legislation, productivity and investment: Evidence from Italy, paper presented at the EALE conference in
  25. (2010). Employment protection legislation: Evolution, effects, winners and losers, Edward Elgar,
  26. (2011). Employment protection reform, enforcement in collective agreements and worker flows, paper presented at
  27. (2010). Employment protection reforms, employment and the incidence of temporary jobs in Europe: 1996-2001,
  28. (2007). Euro-productivity and euro-jobs since the 1960s: Which institutions really mattered?,
  29. (2004). Gross job flows and institutions in Europe,
  30. (1999). Gross job flows,
  31. (2004). How do firing costs affect worker flows in a world with adverse selection?,
  32. (2009). How do institutions affect structural unemployment in times of crisis?, Working Paper 730, Economics Department,
  33. (2008). Identifying the effects of firing restrictions through sizecontingent differences in regulation,
  34. (2001). Insiders versus outsiders,
  35. (2007). Institutional determinants of unemployment in OECD countries: Does the deregulatory view hold water?,
  36. (1997). Institutions and labor reallocation,
  37. (2007). Integration of immigrants in OECD countries: Do policies matter?, Working Paper 564, Economics Department,
  38. (2007). Job flow dynamics and firing restrictions: Evidence from Europe,
  39. (2009). Job security legislation and job duration: Evidence from the United Kingdom,
  40. (1990). Job security provisions and employment,
  41. (1998). Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries’ experiences,
  42. (2007). Labor market institutions and demographic employment patterns,
  43. (1994). Labour flexibility and wages: Lessons from Spain,
  44. (2010). Last-in first-out? Estimating the effect of seniority rules in Sweden,
  45. (2009). Legislation, collective bargaining and enforcement: Updating the OECD employment protection indicators, Working Paper 89, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs,
  46. (1997). Market rigidities and labour market flexibility: An international comparison,
  47. (2005). Measuring job security over time: In search of a historical indicator for EPL (employment protection legislation), Working Paper WP05-17, Instituto de Empresa,
  48. (1999). Microeconomic perspectives on aggregate labor markets,
  49. (2003). Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing,
  50. (2009). Relaxed dismissal protection: Effects on the hiring and firing behaviour of small firms,
  51. (2002). Temporary jobs, employment protection and labor market performance,
  52. (2005). The consequences of labour market flexibility: Panel evidence based on survey data,
  53. (2000). The cost of job security regulation: Evidence from Latin American labor markets,
  54. (2006). The determinants of unemployment across OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions,
  55. (2006). The economic effects of employment protection: Evidence from international industry-level data, Discussion Paper 2433,
  56. (2006). The effects of employment protection and product market regulations on the Italian labour market,
  57. (2005). The effects of employment protection: Learning from variable enforcement,
  58. (2004). The employment consequences of wrongful-discharge laws: Large, small or none at all?,
  59. (2005). The employment effects of severance payments with wage rigidities,
  60. (2007). The impact of employment protection mandates on demographic temporary employment patterns: International microeconomic evidence,
  61. (2002). The perverse effects of partial labour market reform: Fixed-term contracts in France,
  62. (2004). The regulation of labor,
  63. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence,
  64. (2007). Two tier reforms of employment protection: A honeymoon effect?,
  65. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America,
  66. (1993). Unemployment and Macroeconomics,
  67. (2005). Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s. What do we know?,
  68. (2007). Welfare-improving employment protection,
  69. (2005). What have we learned about the employment effects of severance pay? Further iterations of Lazear et al.,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.