Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Performance indicators and health promition targets

By David Buck, Christine Godfrey and Antony Morgan


This paper discusses the usefulness of performance indicators in health promotion. Health promotion and target-setting in health have both risen to the fore in the light of the Health of the Nation White Paper. This coupled with increasing pressure on all sectors of health care to demonstrate their “value-for-money” have meant that health promotion activities are being scrutinised as never before. Performance indicators have been one suggested means of ensuring movement towards Health of the Nation targets and value-for-money in health promotion. The paper outlines the uses to which performance indicators have been put elsewhere in the NHS and argues that they are unlikely to be directly transferrable to health promotion. Criteria for successful performance indicators in health promotion are outlined. However, it is doubtful whether these criteria will be fulfilled to any useful extent at present. The theory of health promotion is characterised by many different views of what is an appropriate outcome measure of any health promotion intervention and therefore what will be an appropriate performance indicator. Consensus in theory is needed before any consensus on what is most suitable to measure is reached. In addition, any outcomes from health promotion, by its very nature, are likely to become apparent only over long periods of time, if at all. This reduces the likelihood of attribution and the feasibility of assigning responsibility for meeting targets. Nonetheless, there is some scope for performance indicators in health promotion and their use as an internal management tool and as mechanisms for reaching external micro and macro level health-related targets is discussed. A collection of suggested macro performance indicators from the Health Education Authority are evaluated according to the criteria developed earlier. It is argued that at present these do not qualify as performance indicators, although they are certainly useful as monitoring tools. The paper concludes with priorities for further research in this area. Despite the emphasis on target-setting brought about by the Health of the Nation, knowledge and expertise in performance indicators for health promotion is lacking. This is a matter of urgent concern. There are many complex conceptual and practical problems which will influence the future role and choice of performance indicators in health promotion. These range from the fundamental, differing views about the definition of health education and health promotion, to the practical, a lack of knowledge at the community level about how to start looking for indicators, and the technical, a lack of clear responsibility for meeting macro-level targets.performance indicators, targets

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1989). (ed) Evaluating Health Promotion Programs.
  2. (1946). Constitution.
  3. (1977). Coronary heart disease and patterns of living.
  4. (1992). Executive Agencies: A Guide to Setting Targets and Measuring Performance.
  5. (1986). Health education and the ideology of health promotion: a review of alternative approaches.
  6. (1994). Health Education Authority
  7. (1993). Health promotion: How to measure cost-effectivenss. London: Health Education Authority.
  8. (1993). Health promotion: models and values.
  9. (1990). Healthy community indicators: the perils of the search and the paucity of the field.
  10. (1994). Helping smokers give up: Guidance for purchasers on costeffectiveness. London: Health Education Authority.
  11. (1988). Issues in the development of health promotion indicators.
  12. (1992). Local Authority Performance Indicators. London: Audit Commission.
  13. (1988). Measuring health behaviour and health.
  14. (1991). Measuring success in health promotion
  15. (1986). National Health Service Performance Indicators and Performance Appraisal: Implications for Management and Planning.
  16. (1993). Performance indicators in health promotion: A review of possibilities and problems. Health Promotion Wales Technical Report 2. Cardiff: Health Promotion Wales.
  17. (1994). Performing Arts. Health Service Journal.
  18. (1984). Predicting changes in perceived status.
  19. (1985). Social inequalities and perceived health.
  20. (1988). Some critical comments on new health promotion indicators: improving social policy or increasing social control?
  21. (1988). Subjective health indicators and health promotion.
  22. (1992). Targets - Are they sensible?
  23. (1985). Targets for health for all. Copenhagen: WHO. Performance Indicators and Health Promotion Targets
  24. (1982). The effect of hypotensive drugs on the quality of life.
  25. (1981). the Environment
  26. (1989). The health benefits of prevention: A simulation approach.
  27. (1992). The Health of the Nation: A strategy for health in England.
  28. (1990). The use of performance indicators in the public sector.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.