Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews

By Christopher G. Leggett, Naomi S. Kleckner, Kevin J. Boyle, John W. Dufield and Robert Cameron Mitchell

Abstract

This paper presents empirical evidence of mode effects in contingent valuation surveys. We conducted an on-site, split-sample contingent valuation survey of visitors to Fort Sumter National Monument, South Carolina. All respondents were told that the survey was being conducted on behalf of the National Park Service. We find that WTP for a fort visit is approximately 23– 29% higher when the survey is administered through face-to-face interviews with a ballot box rather than being self-administered by the respondent.

OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/repr... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.